Back to the Vote With Your Dollar Toolkit

2. BETTER: Independent, Certified Green Businesses

If you need a new clothing item, you can’t do much better than an independent green business that strives to make every aspect of its clothing sustainable, from the fields where the fibers are grown to the factories that assemble and dye the clothes to the retail or online store in which they’re sold. The following companies are just a few of the “deep green” businesses that specialize in sustainable clothing. Each is certified by Green America, meaning we screened them in all aspects of their business to ensure a commitment to social and environmental responsibility.

A member of the Fair Trade Federation, Mehera Shaw ensures a living wage and healthy workplace for the people who print, dye, and sew its boho-chic women’s clothing. The company specializes in women’s clothing made with dazzling hand-dyed, artisan fabrics—including GOTS-certified cotton and other natural fibers.

Circle Creations offers casual, comfy clothing, underwear, and accessories for men and women, made from hemp, organic cotton, Tencel, soy fiber, and locally milled wool. The company ensures workers throughout its supply chain aren't exploited and receive fair benefits.

Stay Vocal’s founder Alex Eaves points out that the average T-shirt requires 400 gallons of water to grow the cotton to make it. To save resources and promote reuse, the company searches out old and factory-discarded T-shirts for men, women, and children—which are then printed with clever designs and slogans touting the benefits of reuse.

Started by four former executives from major brands Ann Taylor, Lands’ End, and Macy’s, Fair Indigo sells Fair Trade, organic clothing and accessories for men, women, and children. As such, the company offers all of its employees, from Madison, WI, to Lima, Peru, a living wage, fair working conditions, and excellent benefits. Many of the items are made from ecofriendly materials.

All of the above and more can be found in the clothing/accessories category of our greenpages.org.

Find more options: Good, Better, Best.

Back to the Vote With Your Dollar Toolkit

Garbage. Americans produce more and more of it every year, when we need to be producing less. Even the most waste-conscious among us can feel overwhelmed by the amount of household waste that goes beyond what municipal recyclers and compost bins can handle. We've spent a lot of time investigating the state of waste management in our country, so we can explain how to get serious about the three R’s – reducing, reusing, and recycling — and divert more waste away from landfills. (To download the entire recycling issue of Green American, visit our archives page.)

1. Appliances: Goodwill accepts working appliances, or you can contact the Steel Recycling Institute to recycle them.

2. Batteries: Try Battery Solutions to buy a product to put batteries in to ship away. Staples also has a national battery recycling program for individuals or your office. Some Ikea stores have recycling stations for them as well.

3. Cardboard boxes: Contact local nonprofits and women’s shelters to see if they can use them. Or, offer up used cardboard boxes at your local Freecycle.org listserv or on Craigslist.org for others who may need them for moving or storage. If your workplace collects at least 100 boxes or more each month, UsedCardboardBoxes.com accepts them for resale.

4. CDs/DVDs/Game Disks: Send scratched music or computer CDs, DVDs, and PlayStation or Nintendo video game disks to CDFixers for refinishing, and they’ll work like new.

5. Clothes: Wearable clothes can go to your local Goodwill outlet or shelter. Donate wearable women’s business clothing to Dress for Success, which gives them to low-income women as they search for jobs. Offer unwearable clothes and towels to local animal boarding and shelter facilities, which often use them as pet bedding. Consider holding a clothes swap at your office, school, faith congregation or community center. Swap clothes with friends and colleagues, and save money on back-to-school clothes, Halloween costumes, or any season you want.

6. Compact fluorescent bulbs: Call your local Ikea store--many have units for recycling florescent bulbs, along with batteries and conventional recyclables. Earth911 has a great tool where you can enter your recyclable and zip code and it will give you a list of places that will accept that item.

7. Compostable bio-plastics: Compostable bioplastics include those cornstarch utensils and specially marked cups, which won't break down quickly in your home compost bin like your food scraps do. Find a Composter has a tool for finding municipal composters for these types of items.

8. Computers and electronics: E-Stewards has a tool for finding responsible recyclers for computing waste which can be toxic and hard to break down.

9. Exercise videos: If you've done the same workouts a million times, swap them with others at Video Fitness. If you're done with them forever, contact your closest e-waste station and see if they will accept them. Policies change frequently and the magnetic tape in VHS makes them particularly difficult to recycle.

10. Eyeglasses: Your local Lion’s Club or eye care chain may collect these. Lenses are reground and given to people in need. Often eye doctors' offices will collect them, or even local libraries. Glasses are most often donated as-is to someone with a similar perscription. Reading glasses and non-perscription sunglasses can often be donated as well.

11. Foam packing: Your local pack-and-ship store will likely accept foam peanuts for reuse. Or, call the Plastic Loose Fill Producers Council to find a drop-off site. For places to drop off foam blocks for recycling, contact the Alliance of Foam Packaging Recyclers.

12. Ink/toner cartridges: Recycleplace.org will pay a few cents for your old ink cartridges, up to $1 depending on the brand. If you bring your old cartridges to Staples, they will give you a $2 voucher you can use towards your new ink. Also, Best Buy accepts ink cartridges, as they have a large recycling program.

13. Oil: When the oil is being changed in your car, it can be re-refined and made into motor lubricants and other petroleum products. Earth911 has a tool to find which autoshops you can use to recycle oil in your zip code.

14. Phones: HopeLine is a program to provide cell phones to domestic violence survivors. Bring them to a Verizon or mail them in to donate. Office phones and corded phones can be recycled through Staples or another e-waste recycler.

15. Sports equipment: Resell or trade it at your local Play It Again Sports outlet or at Goodwill.

16. “Technotrash”: Staples' e-waste program will take iPods, MP3 players, cell phones and chargers, digital cameras, PDAs, palm pilots, and more. Also, easily recycle all of your CDs, jewel cases, DVDs, audio and video tapes, pagers, rechargeable and single-use batteries, PDAs, and ink/toner cartridges with GreenDisk’s Technotrash program. For $11.95, GreenDisk will send you a cardboard box (or you can use your own) in which you can ship them up to 25 pounds of any of the above. Your fee covers the box as well as shipping and recycling fees.

17. Athletic and other shoes: MORE takes donations of lightly used running shoes which are resold to fund sustainable farming programs. Soles4Souls was founded after Hurricane Katrina, which gives shoes as a measure of disaster relief and to create micro-enterprises with a low cost product.

18. Toothbrushes and razors: Buy a recycled plastic toothbrush or razor from Preserve, a brand sold in many pharmacy stores as well as online. The company makes its products out of Stonyfield Farms yogurt cups and will take back its products to be made into plastic lumber. Bins that collect these and other products with the number 5 recycling symbol are collected in Preserve's Gimme 5 bins, which are placed in 250 locations nationwide. They can also be sent in by mail.

19. Tyvek envelopes: Those tough, plasticky envelopes you get in the mail, those are Tyvek. The material is broken down and made into new plastics without consuming more oil resources. Quantities less than 25: Send to CFS Recycling, 337 A Industrial Drive, Petersburg, VA 23803. Quantities larger than 25, call 1-800/44-TYVEK.

20. Miscellaneous stuff: Get your unwanted items into the hands of people who can use them. Offer them up on your local Freecycle.org or Craigslist.org listserv.

21. Crayons: If you have broken crayons, or old mis-matched ones that are missing the box, send them to Crazy Crayons. This program collects crayons from around the country, melts them down, and sells 100% recycled crayons (in cute shapes and containers, too!).

Many pet owners will attest that having a cat or dog to cuddle can brighten your day. What they may not know is that it may also improve your health. A 2010 study from the University of Missouri School of Veterinary Medicine found that positive interactions with animals can raise levels of the hormone oxytocin, which helps encourage healing and new cell growth.

Since pets can be exposed to harmful toxins in their food, litter, and flea medicine, bringing green-living values to pet ownership may help extend the life of your beloved animal companion. Meanwhile, your pet-related purchases will also support the green economy.

If you don't have a pet yet, adopting from a shelter is the most sustainable option. If you do have one, make sure to spay or neuter it-- it helps to reduce the number of animals that end up homeless or living in shelters.

Here are Green America’s top five high-impact ways to green your dog or cat:

1. Put Your Pet on a Low-Carbon Diet

Just like a human, omnivorous cats and dogs eat food with a significant greenhouse gas footprint: namely, food with beef or lamb in it. The Environmental Working Group’s “Meat Eater’s Guide” notes that beef produces 13 times more greenhouse gases over its life cycle than vegetable proteins, and the carbon footprint of lamb is 50 percent higher.

Poultry produces four to five times as many greenhouse gases as vegetable proteins, so choose poultry-based foods for your omnivorous pet that contain no animal by-products or artificial preservatives, like the chicken and vegetable options in the Life’s Abundance and Natural Life lines of cat and dog foods.

Even better: Some companies make organic vegetarian and chicken-based pet food, which helps ensure that no synthetic pesticides have been sprayed on the food. The Honest Kitchen makes organic pet foods, and Onesta Organics sells organic raw food treats for cats and dogs. Bixbi’s Organic Superfood line of food for active and older dogs is made with turkey and free-radical-fighting “superfoods” to promote digestive, joint, or immune-system health.

Many veterinarians say that cats should not be fed a vegetarian diet; they need more protein and other nutrients found in meat than humans. However, dogs can go vegetarian, though it’s best to make the switch under the supervision of a vet to ensure proper nutrition.

V-Dog LLC offers vegan dog food. In addition to its omnivorous foods, Natural Life has a Vegetarian Formula for adult dogs. If you have the time and inclination, you can also make your own organic and vegetarian dog food. Find recipes at organicauthority.com.

2. Use re-purposed doggie bags

After diet, pet waste is where your dog or cat has the most impact on the planet. No truly responsible pet owner takes a dog out for a walk without a plastic bag for pet waste tucked in a pocket. There are a lot of pet-waste bags out there that trumpet the fact that they’re “biodegradable” or “compostable” on their packaging, but since most bags of poo are destined for the landfill, the biodegradable label doesn’t mean all that much. When buried in a landfill and cut off from oxygen, even a biodegradable or compostable bag won’t degrade aerobically and turn into compost; instead, it’ll degrade very slowly and odoriferously, with the help of anaerobic bacteria.

A better option is to repurpose the plastic bags that were used to package your clothing, food, or junk mail. Perhaps the best option, however, is to forego the bags altogether and actually compost your pet’s waste.

3. Even better, compost it

You don’t want to add dog or cat waste to the compost pile destined for your garden, because it can contain pathogens that aren’t safe on your food. However, you can set up a separate compost system for it that will reduce the volume of your pet’s waste by at least 50 percent, kill off most of the pathogens, and add nutrients to the soil, according to the US Department of Agriculture.

Canada’s Office of Urban Agriculture has step-by-step instructions for a separate pet waste composting system. It involves drilling holes in a small, lidded garbage can, burying it with the lid sticking out, and dropping pet waste inside, as well as a packet of nontoxic enzymatic septic starter (available at your local hardware store) and a liter of water every month. The site says you should only need to empty the can every two to three years.

You can safely compost an herbivorous pet’s waste in your garden compost (i.e. rabbit, hamster, guinea pig, etc.).

4. Choose better litter

Conventional cat litter—clumping and non-clumping—is made from bentonite clay, which is extracted from the Earth through environmentally damaging strip mining. In addition, clay litter contains crystalline silica, a known carcinogen according to the World Health Organization.

Clay litter is also near the end of its decomposition cycle, so if you try to compost waste with clay litter mixed in, the litter will just sit there.

The solution: natural, non-clay litters. To avoid silica dust, try World’s Best Cat Litter, which is made from 100 percent US-grown corn, or Swheat Scoop, which is made from wheat. Both corn and wheat are naturally clumping and odor-controlling.

If you’d rather not buy cat litter made from a food crop, try Feline Pine, which is made from reclaimed pine shavings and guar bean gum, or Yesterday’s News, made from recycled newspaper.

While it’s best to buy litter from a smaller green company, Arm & Hammer’s Essentials line of clumping litters may be easier to find in a pinch: the company claims it’s made from corn fibers, baking soda, and plant extracts.

5. Prevent fleas naturally

Fleas are itchy nuisances, but flea collars and conventional flea shampoos usually contain pyrethrins and organophosphates, which are suspected neurotoxicants and carcinogens.

To keep fleas at bay, tend your pet with a flea comb weekly. And use nontoxic shampoos like the organic, ayurvedic products from Dr. Desai Soap. Dr. Desai also sells a nontoxic neem oil flea and tick repellent for pets.

If you’re experiencing a full-out flea infestation in your home, head to your local home improvement store for a bag of food-grade diatomaceous earth (DE). It’s made of the skeletons of deceased diatoms, a type of algae. Don’t be troubled that food-grade DE contains amorphous silica—it’s crystalline silica (found in pool-grade DE) that has been linked to lung toxicity and cancer.

Annie Bond, author of Home Enlightenment (Rodale Books 2008), recommends doing the following:

• Though food-grade DE is safe for plants, pets, and humans, cover your mouth and nose and your pet’s to prevent uncomfortable inhalation.
• Then, rub it all over your pet’s fur, starting with the spine and working your way down. The fleas should die within 24-72 hours, though you may need to repeat every three days until they’re gone.
• Sprinkle DE across floors and carpets and surfaces. Leave it sitting for four days (best if you can leave the home), and then vacuum. Repeat if needed.
• Spread DE on lawns and outdoor surfaces to kill fleas outside, too.

6. Sustainable pets are always in style

There are numerous green products available for your everyday pet needs. Find collars and leashes made from hemp or dog and cat toys from organic fibers, organic pet beds, and even reclaimed cotton dog sweaters, from certified green businesses at GreenPages.org. 

Perhaps you want to bike more, but you don’t actually own a bike and would rather not shell out the money for one. Bike-sharing programs are a convenient, low-cost alternative to buying a bicycle that also build community.

Bike-sharing programs are generally either bike shares or bike libraries. With bike shares, there are typically multiple kiosks of bikes throughout the city, and people rent bikes for short day-trips. In a bike library, people check out bikes for longer periods of time. At some, members can borrow bikes for as long as two weeks at a time and also have access to a repair shop.

Co-ops now serve as a collection point for used, broken, and old bikes—as well as those abandoned by college students forced to leave them behind when they can’t find a way to transport them home at the end of the school year. Members pool their bike mechanic skills to refurbish the donated bicycles, which then go into the bike-share fleet. Eric Cornwell, an avid cyclist from Athens, OH, visited Austria last summer and was inspired by a bike share program he saw in Vienna. He was already a member of the Athens Bike Co-op, a student group at Ohio University aimed at encouraging students and community members to bike more and drive less. When he came back from his summer vacation and told the co-op about Vienna’s program, and they all agreed to start a bike share of their own. (Note: since the publishing of this article, Athens Bike Co-op was renamed to UpCycle Bikes, but still serves the same purpose and is run by Cornwell)

Their initial goal for the bike share was to start with at least 25 bikes. They had just started pounding the pavement, asking local citizens and businesses for donations, when the manager of an off-campus apartment complex provided more than enough abandoned bikes to start the program. Cornwell estimated that it took eight hours and about $25 to $30 to refurbish each bike. Some local businesses helped by donating their services, such as Athens Paint and Decorating donating sheets of coroplast, which Cornwell used to make the bikes’ baskets.

Some bike-sharing programs are solely based on trust and don’t require a fee for bike rental—a fleet of specially marked bikes are simply parked around a city for people to use at will. However, to prevent bike vandalism or theft, many have introduced a mechanism—such as a fee, deposit, or electronic kiosk that can track the bike sharer’s credit card—to regulate bike use. Some bike shares customize the design of the bike fleet with unique wheels or frames that aren’t compatible with any other type of bike, making them useless to thieves looking for parts.

The Athens bike share’s yellow bikes are chained to various bike racks around Ohio University’s campus, all with uniform locks. For a $10 membership fee, bicyclists get a key that unlocks any of the bikes. The bike share currently has about 20 to 25 members on and off campus (including the city’s mayor), who can unlock any yellow bike they see, ride it to their destination, and then lock it to the nearest bike rack for another member to use.

Cornwell says that the program was fairly simple to launch. “There’s no requirement that you have to have some special instruction to do this. People can pretty much figure it out for themselves,” he says. “It basically takes the will to want to do something like that, and the rest follows.”

In the year that it’s been operating, the Athens bike share still has all of its original bikes in working order, and the co-op continues to gain a lot of positive buzz. “People I don’t even know will tell me what a great thing it is, and what a valuable resource it is for the community,” says Cornwell.

When the Betz-Essinger family sits down for dinner in Birmingham, AL, it doesn’t take the children long to identify the provenance of their meal. “Is this a Caroline?” they ask, “or a Leigh Fran?”

Caroline and Leigh Fran are not brands of frozen dinners—they are the two friends with whom Ruthann Betz-Essinger has shared the preparation of weeknight meals for more than a decade. Ruthann’s children “know how each of us cooks,” she laughs.

Through an arrangement known as “cooperative cooking,” the friends each prepare a single, large meal that will feed all three families, and package it up. One share goes into their own refrigerators, and on Sundays, the women meet at Betz-Essinger’s house to give each other the other two shares. So in exchange for cooking one meal, each family gets three meals—which, with leftovers, is often enough to provide dinner for every weeknight.

“When you get your sack, it’s got everything in it, with directions about what to do, and how long it will take to cook or reheat,” says Betz-Essinger.

On busy weeknights, when Betz-Essinger gets home from work, she and her children open the refrigerator to find a “Caroline” or “Leigh Fran” meal already assembled. “It’s like eating at a restaurant every night,” says Betz-Essinger, “only you take whatever the chef is making.”

From college campuses to apartment buildings, and from suburban neighborhoods to cohousing communities, many busy people have found that cooking cooperatively, especially for the after-work dinners on weeknights, can save time and money, and deepen connections with family and community—all while supporting healthy, green food choices. Though cooking co-op arrangements vary, they all take advantage of the fact that cooking one meal for a crowd, once a week, requires less money, less planning, and less time than cooking five to seven different meals for one’s own family.

In the process, cooking co-ops also ensure food variety; minimize the temptation to go out to eat or purchase expensive, highly processed convenience or fast foods; share food traditions among members; and inspire participants to try out special recipes. And co-op cooking can free up some room in your food budget to shift to greener food choices.

How It Works

Cooking co-ops across the country have established a range of systems for sharing
the cooking of family meals.

A potluck group may ask participants to contribute a component of the meal each time, and then eat together on a specific day of every week or month.

A meal group may rotate the preparation of a meal among the participants, and gather regularly at the host’s home to eat together.

The residents of the Eastern Village Cohousing community in Silver Spring, MD, do both. They begin the week with a standing Monday evening potluck, which anyone can join by bringing a dish to share. And they close out the weekend with a rotating Sunday meal group, in which each participant takes about two turns every three months to make dinner for 12 others.

As with Ruthann Betz-Essinger’s group, the members of a “pick-up” cooking co-op share cooking responsibilities but do the eating at home, with their own families.

In Bakersfield, CA, Jan Limiero organizes ten friends once a month to each prepare one recipe, for ten families, that will freeze well; each family takes home a freezer’s worth of different meals ready to reheat and serve. In Occidental, CA, six families stop by a member’s home from 6–7 p.m. on Mondays and Wednesdays to pick up a meal that one member has prepared for the others, according to the Sonoma County Independent. In Berkeley, CA, Laila Ibrahim is one of six adults in three neighboring households who have each rotated cooking, six nights a week, for more than seven years. The family that cooks delivers a meal to each of the others by 6 p.m.

All three types of cooking co-ops have a wide range of policies about what participants make for dinner. Betz-Essinger’s group in Alabama, self-identified “foodies,” endeavor to rotate entrees every week, and to never repeat a recipe. The Berkeley co-op is free to cook anything, but always in a way that accommodates vegetarian families. The Bobolink co-op in Rutledge, MO, eats organic, local, and vegan. And most of the student-organized dining co-ops at Oberlin College come to consensus at the start of each semester about the sourcing of the food they will cook for each other.

Benefits of Cooking Cooperatively

Co-op cooking saves time and money at every step: When planning and shopping, purchasing for a single meal in quantity is less complicated than purchasing for a week of different meals. It saves time in the evenings, when families don’t have to cook after work and can instead spend more time talking to and enjoying each other. And it saves clean-up time, since the kitchen only gets really messy on the night when the meal is cooked there.

Co-op cooking also saves money.  On the Oberlin campus, students save $4,000 a year by cooking cooperatively rather than eating in the dining halls. Ruthann Betz Essinger estimates that she saves 25 percent at the supermarket compared to cooking all of her family’s meals herself. And Amy Seiden at Bobolink, a food co-op at Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage in Missouri, says the members manage to eat a delicious lunch and dinner for just $6 per person per day. In addition to purchasing fewer ingredients, families in cooking co-ops can save money by purchasing food on sale or in bulk for the one meal they plan to make in quantity.

By rotating the planning of meals among a large group of households, each with their own favorites recipes and food traditions, cooking co-ops also enjoy a much greater variety of food than isolated families cooking for themselves.

“We can’t get into a rut, because we don’t eat the same thing over and over again,” says Betz Essinger. “It was an amazing thing for our children. They were exposed to a huge variety of food that if I had been the only one cooking for them, they would never have tried.”

Cooking co-ops help families save money and eat more healthfully in other ways: They eat fewer meals out, including fast food. Consequently, they’ll save energy and resources, and reduce waste—no styrofoam take-out containers and foil wrappings, fewer car trips, and more room in their dinner menus for local, organic food.

Co-op cooking builds community. Becca Rosen says her responsibilities as a student member of the Oberlin cooking co-ops built connections with more than just her meals: “I built my social life around food,” she says. “I made my closest friends at Oberlin because we ended up cooking together.”

Co-ops that dine together build connections over shared meals and lively group conversation, and celebrate diverse family food traditions through the dishes they serve to each other. Even a “pick-up” co-op builds long-term connections when neighbors pick up or drop off meals, often exchanging friendly greetings and checking in on each other in the process. All forms of cooperative cooking mean less time that each person spends cooking and cleaning up, and more time spent talking, laughing, and connecting over food with family and friends.

Making It Easier to Cook Green

One of the best perks of co-op cooking is that the money you’ll save can make it easier to afford to green your food choices.

“Cooking co-ops are a perfect example of the ways that greening a whole category of our purchasing can work,” says Alisa Gravitz, Green America’s executive director. “An organic, local apple may cost more than a conventionally grown apple, and Fair Trade Certified™ vanilla may still cost a little bit more than conventional vanilla. But if you cook cooperatively, then the savings on your food budget from buying in bulk can make it possible to green your remaining food purchases. By thinking about the whole category of food holistically, you can eat greener, healthier, more varied meals—at the same cost as your old way of eating.” (See below for a sampling of Green America’s resources for eating green.)

Some cooking co-ops, like the Bobolink and Oberlin co-ops, establish green guidelines about preparing local and organic foods, or emphasizing vegetarian and vegan menus. Co-op cooking lends itself to making use of the bounty of seasonal vegetables or fruits that a farmers’ market or Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) box can offer. Making a large meal for a co-op crowd can help singles or small families put a box of CSA produce to good use before the next share arrives.

Tips for Forming a Cooking Co-op

What would families who have cooked cooperatively for years recommend to those considering forming their own cooking co-ops?
 

• Pick families who make it very easy to get the food to them, either through a common drop-off/pick up point, or by forming a co-op with neighbors or coworkers. Set up delivery times that fit with everyone’s schedule.
• Find people whose families are similar sizes, because it makes portioning easier.
• Find people with similar food tastes and practices.
• Establish clear guidelines for what the group expects each member to make when it’s his/her turn. A planning calendar can help to ensure a variety of foods.
• Find people who are prepared to accept and eat whatever is served, but are also willing to share honest feedback. “We might send a note with a meal we’ve made, saying, ‘This is hideous. I won’t ever make it again,’” laughs Betz-Essinger. “And sometimes I’ll get calls that say, ‘That wasn’t so bad.’ But sometimes they’ll call and say, ‘You’re right. Don’t ever make that again.’”
• Package foods in containers that can be both frozen, reheated, and then reused, such as Pyrex baking dishes. Secondhand stores such as Goodwill can be an inexpensive way to acquire additional containers. If you’d like to eat well, save time and money, and build community in the process, consider forming a cooking co-op.

“I love the co-op,” says Laila Ibrahim in Berkeley, whose family recently enjoyed a tasty pasta with onions, capers, and salmon delivered to their door, along with bread and a salad. “It makes our lives so much better. Cooking a nice meal once a week is just perfect.”

For Susan Gunn, it all started with a haircut. New to her home in Washington, DC, with a young daughter, a working husband, and no extended family nearby, Gunn found scheduling her much-needed trim to be a logistical nightmare.

“I just couldn’t find the time to get away go to the salon,” recalls Gunn. “We were young and on a budget, and hiring a babysitter was out of the question.”

At the same time, the Gunns were seeking out friends in a similar stage of life, with whom, as Susan Gunn puts it, “we could share in the ups and downs of everyday parenting.”

Some online research introduced Gunn to babysitting cooperatives—an arrangement between several families where parents exchange babysitting responsibilities for each others’ children, giving everyone the break they need with no money passing hands.

“What a great concept!” Gunn thought at the time, “I could get a haircut, my child could play with other kids, and we might make friends with other parents.”

So Gunn circulated a proposal at local playgrounds, eventually organizing a planning meeting at her home. Now, nine years later, the Meridian Hill Coop is still thriving, providing members not only with free child care, but with friends and a sense of community.

Care cooperatives are becoming increasingly popular—and they don’t have to focus on child care. You can set up a similar arrangement to watch over elderly parents, adults with disabilities, or pets. Consider starting a care cooperative of your own to build community and resiliency while saving money.

Getting Started
Most successful care co-ops involve a written agreement, a point system for earning and spending care hours, and community building within the co-op to encourage communication and fun.

First, gather families together. Think about the size of the cooperative you want to form. Too few members will mean not having enough people able to help, but too many could mean losing the community feeling of a care cooperative. Many care co-ops have found the “sweet spot” at 12-20 families.

Then, take the time to talk about, and write down, your expectations.

“Setting clear expectations is key to any sharing arrangement,” says attorney Janelle Orsi, coauthor of The Sharing Solution (Nolo, 2009), which guides people through sharing everything from child care to a car or a house. “A common problem in sharing arrangements is thatpeople disappoint each other.”

Orsi’s book contains a list of 20 questions to ask in any sharing arrangement, such as: How will we make decisions? How will we divide expenses and manage money? How will we bring new people into the group?

Orsi also recommends covering other ground particularly relevant to sharing care, such as: Are there ground rules about what kids eat/drink while being babysat? How are disciplinary matters with children approached? What are the ground rules for watching TV/ movies? How will medication be handled for children or adults? Do you want to exchange care for elderly parents, or share a hired caregiver?

And don’t forget to talk to the people receiving care as well, whether its your child or an elderly parent or friend, to ensure their comfort in any arrangement.

There are also stickier questions, says Orsi, like what to do if there is a conflict between families. Orsi recommends having good conflict-resolution procedures in place, perhaps even taking the time to get trained in nonviolent communication. The Center for Nonviolent Communication has primers on resolving conflicts peacefully and a schedule for formal, local trainings at cnvc.org.

Establish a Record-Keeping System
In any care co-op, you need some way to keep track the hours people are earning and spending. Gunn’s babysitting co-op uses a point system. Each new family starts with 20 points. One hour of babysitting is worth four points. A sitter earns two extra points for each additional child and two extra points for coming to the family’s home.

In some cases, families dole out tickets, tokens, or even popsicle sticks to signify how much “capital” they have to use in the co-op, but it’s also easy to keep track of points electronically.

You can record points in an online spreadsheet like Google Documents, which allows many people to view files. Several online systems also exist to help coordinate a care co-op of all kinds, including BabysitterExchange.com and BabysittingCoop.com.

Orsi says it’s a good idea to appoint an administrator to help keep the books, and your co-op may need some other organizational roles as well. Gunn’s co-op has a secretary to track points, a chair to manage applications from new families, and a social secretary to plan monthly get togethers for members. These roles can rotate every few months, or come with the perk of earning extra points to entice people to hold onto them.

Get it in Writing
Once you’ve established your ground rules and procedures, put it all in writing for members of the co-op to sign.

“We aren’t necessariliy talking about a legally binding contract,” says Orsi, “but a written agreement that ensures everyone is on the same page.”

You can also use this agreement to create an application process for new families who want to join the co-op. Orsi’s book contains a sample agreement, and many are also available online at the Web sites mentioned above.

Start Caring
Let the caring and sharing begin! The way members request care will vary depending on how you set up the co-op, but the basics are the same. When you need caregiving, you send out a message stating your needs (some groups use an e-mail listserv, like Yahoo Groups or Google Groups; others use online services that manage communication), and other parents respond if they can take the job. You’ll also receive requests from other parents—and you’ll earn points when you babysit their kids. Or if the care you need help with occurs regularly, like checking in on an elderly parent or dropping off meals to a home-bound friend, members of the co-op can use an online calendar to schedule care.

Build Community
Establishing good lines of communication is essential for a successful co-op. That’s why it’s a good idea to schedule regular get-togethers, like a monthly potluck meal, where co-op members can talk about any issues that may have come up. And getting together regularly doesn’t just let the co-op get its business done—it helps build a community of support and friendship. While Susan Gunn has valued the time and money saved through participation in the Meridian Hill Co-op for almost a decade, it’s the close community that she values most.

“Our children have great friendship with kids in the neighborhood and feel close to lots of adults,” says Gunn.

“There’s a closeness that comes when you share in caring for each other’s children that feels really wonderful.”

You don’t have to belong to a worker-owned co-op to get the benefits. Cooperative models can also help you lower costs and build community at home. Here are our seven favorite ways to save money with cooperatives at home:

Share goods

Items you don’t use every day make great things to buy together and share with your neighbors, to save money and reduce clutter. Consider sharing things like: tools, vacuum cleaners, small cooking appliances like juicers or yogurt makers, yard tools like lawnmowers or snow and leaf blowers, video cameras, camping gear, large sports equipment like kayaks, extra tables and chairs, and more. Each neighbor could contribute an item, or you can pay for them together. Keep them in a shared shed or location to which everyone has access. For practical and legal advice on starting up informal sharing groups, read Janelle Orsi and Emily Doskow’s book The Sharing Solution (Nolo, 2009).

Share child, pet, or elder care

Many groups across the country have banded together to swap care hours. Most track hours on a shared spreadsheet, like those available at babysitterexchange.com and babysittingcoop.com—so if you spend two hours caring for someone’s toddler, for example, you can get two hours of babysitting for your ten year-old in return from someone else in the co-op. Find out more in our article,“Caring for Children and Elders, Cooperatively.”

Share a car

Live in a city where you don’t need a car every day? Car-sharing programs across the country provide access to a fleet of cars when you need them, for much less money than you’d have to spend buying and maintaining your own car. Find a car-sharing network near you via carsharing.net, or see if you live in one of the 50+ cities or 250 college campuses across the US that has a Zipcar.com car-sharing program. Prefer to keep your car but share rides on occasion? Our article “Carpool for the Climate and Community” has valuable tips for you. Or, get advice to start a bike share here.

Share food

Meal cooperatives help busy people eat healthy, home-cooked food more often with less time required in the kitchen. Participants either agree to bring an item for a regular potluck, or take turns cooking meals for each other—usually on a weekly basis, with coworkers in the office or with neighbors at home. Meals can either be shared together, for an added sense of community, or dropped off, for a low maintenance sharing of labor. For more details, see our article, “Cook One Meal, Eat for a Week.”

Share solar power

Solar buying co-ops are popping up across the US as people join together to share in the pre-purchase research and to negotiate lower group rates for solar panels. Several report shaving from 50 to 80 percent off the cost of their solar home systems. Consult our article, “Solar Buying Co-ops,” to learn more.

Share tools and home repair

Need to do some repairs or energy-efficiency retrofits on your home? Chances are your neighbors do, too, but are balking for the same reason you are: the costs. So pool your home repair knowledge while saving lots of money as you fix up each other’s houses. Find out more in our article, “Neighborhood Home Repair Teams.”

Save money at your local co-op

The stories of cooperatives here focus on models that are transforming local economies in significant ways. But co-ops can transform the contents of your pocketbook, too, by helping you save money on green necessities.

Many food co-ops offer a program where members can volunteer a couple hours a week in exchange for a discount on organic food and body care items. At People’s Food Co-op in Portland, Oregon, for example, member-owners can opt to work in the store in exchange for an up-to 15 percent discount on their purchases. Since the co-op’s mission is to provide good food to its members at the lowest cost, its prices are already lower than what consumers would see in the organic section of a chain grocery store.

If you don’t have a food co-op nearby, save money by gathering five friends and form a buying club with Frontier Natural Products Co-op. Frontier provides everything from organic foods and body care items to Fair Trade herbs and essential oils. The worker-owners of this national co-op have committed to prioritizing “purity and quality, environmental responsibility, and respect for the people involved in growing the products,” says CEO Tony Bedard.

Buying clubs enjoy wholesale prices (35 to 50 percent off) when shopping by paper catalog or online, and they save shipping costs and reduce related climate emissions, too.

First time here? Check out the most recent and updated version of this article: Bottled Water VS. Tap.

It seems like the demand for bottled water in the US will never run dry. In 2015, the equivalent of 88.4 billion bottles of water were sold in the US (equivalent because of different-sized bottles). When we first published with story, we reported 2005's record-high use of 29.8 billion bottles in a year vs. 3.8 billion in 1997. Container Recycling Institute (CRI). That enormous rise in bottled water consumption wasn’t just more expensive for consumers—the Container Recycling Institute says those consumers pay 240 to 10,000 times more for bottled water than tap. That water also comes with hefty social and environmental costs.

Here’s why bottled water isn’t worth the price many pay for it

No safer: A four-year study conducted by the nonprofit National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) in 1999 found that “bottled water regulations are inadequate to assure consumers of either purity or safety.” Bottled water is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), while the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees tap water standards. FDA testing for bottled water is more lax than EPA testing for public water—tests are conducted less often, and for fewer contaminants. For example, the FDA does not mandate testing of bottled water for cryptosporidium, a parasite that poses a serious health threat to those with weakened immune systems and the elderly. Tap water is regularly tested for cryptosporidium. The NRDC study authors also tested 1,000 bottled water samples from 103 brands, and found that one-third contained contaminants that exceeded FDA-mandated levels.

Not always from a pristine source: The NRDC found that one-fourth of bottled water is actually just tap water, with or without extra filtration (labeled “from a municipal source.”) FDA rules allow bottlers to label their water “spring water,” even though it may be treated with chemicals or mechanically pumped to the surface. And there’s no guarantee that the spring itself is a pure one: One brand of spring water traced to its source by the NRDC came from a spring that bubbled up into an industrial parking lot, adjacent to a hazardous waste site.

Worse for the environment: The production and transport of bottled water unnecessarily uses large amounts of fossil fuels. (Fiji-brand water, for example, is transported to the US from Fiji, over 6,000 miles away.) And the plastic water bottles Americans use and toss in one year use up more than 47 million gallons of oil, the equivalent of taking 100,000 cars off the road and removing 1 billion pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, says the CRI. Sadly, about 84 percent of those bottles aren’t even recycled.

Bad for human rights: Today, more than one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. Bottled water corporations are exacerbating the world water crisis by privatizing aquifers around the world and pumping them dry. For example, Nestlé has been criticized by activists for heavy water extraction in areas of Pakistan that suffer from severe public water shortages. For more on how specific bottled water companies affect communities—and how to join consumer campaigns fighting this practice—visit ourResponsibleShopper.org database.

First time here? Check out the most recent and updated version of this article: Bottled Water VS. Tap.

Beverage companies have made a fortune on marketing bottled water on the premise that it’s “pure,” from “pristine, natural sources,” and thereby safer than tap water. Bottled water marketing campaigns have been so successful in making people suspicious of their tap water, that sales skyrocketed 700% between 1997 and 2005. And from 1999 to 2017, per capita bottled water consumption ballooned from 16.2 gallons to 42.1 gallons.

Skyrocketing as well—the environmental degradation, landfill waste, and human rights abuses associated with bottled water. Plus, studies have shown that it’s no safer than tap water. The EPA notes that bottled water, like any water, can be expected to have some contaminants, although that does not make it unsafe.

There’s a much better option for ensuring that the water you and your family drink is as safe as it can be: water filters. Putting a safe water filter in your home is less expensive and far less environmentally damaging than bottled water. And if you choose the right filter, you can minimize or eliminate the contaminants of the highest concern in your area. Here’s what you need to know:

How Safe Is Public Water?

Under the Safe Water Drinking Act, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for setting national drinking water standards. The EPA regulates over 80 contaminants—including arsenic, e-coli, cryptosporidia, chlorine, and lead—that may be found in drinking water from public water systems. While the EPA says that 90% of US public water systems meet its standards, you may want to use a water filter to further ensure your water’s safety.

A 2015 study by the nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) found that due to a combination of pollution and deteriorating equipment and pipes, the public water supplies for 18 million Americans have lead violations or other EPA-restricted contaminants (either legal limits or unenforceable suggested limits) and may pose health risks to some residents. So even though it may test fine at its source, public water may still pick up contaminants on the way to your house.

Contaminants that snuck into city water supplies studied by the NRDC include rocket fuel, arsenic, lead, fecal waste, and chemical by-products created during water treatment.

“Exposure to the contaminants [sometimes found in public and private drinking water] can cause a number of health problems, ranging from nausea and stomach pain to developmental problems and cancer,” notes Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR) in its booklet, Drinking Water: What Health Care Providers Should Know.

PSR estimates that up to 900,000 people get sick and 900 die in the US per year from contaminated public and private drinking water. Despite the problems with public water, it’s still just as safe as bottled water, despite the billions of dollars beverage companies spend to make you think bottled is better.

Step One: Assess Your Tap Water

There isn’t a one-type-fits-all kind of safe water filter: not every filter type will eliminate every contaminant. You’ll save money and ensure that you’re targeting the contaminants of concern in your area by doing a little research upfront.

“Most people purchase the wrong equipment because they skip this very important step, and then they’ve wasted money and resources on a system that isn’t making their water any safer,” says James P. McMahon, owner of Sweetwater, LLC, which provides consulting and products for people wanting to purify their air or water.

To start, check your water utility’s “Consumer Confidence Report,” which it must mail to you each year before July 1 by law. The report details where your drinking water comes from, what contaminants have been found in it, and how contaminant levels compare to national standards. You can also call your utility and ask for a copy, or see if it’s online.

While your report can tell you what’s going on with the water in your area, only a test of the water coming out of your tap will tell you what you and your family are drinking for sure.

If your water comes from a private well, it’s not regulated at all by the EPA, so you should have your water tested annually in late spring (when pesticide runoff will be at its worst), and anytime you notice a change in the color or taste of your water.

Step Two: Find the Best Water Filter

Water filters come in a dizzying variety, from plastic pitcher filters and built-in refrigerator filters, to faucet and under-the-sink filters, to whole-house models that combine a variety of media types and treat all of the water in your house. What type you want depends on your needs.

If, after examining your Consumer Confidence Report (or, preferably, your current and several past reports), you find that your water regularly tests better than EPA levels, you may just want a filter that can remove the chemicals your local utility uses to treat the water.

These chemicals may or may not show up on your report. Call and ask your utility if it uses chlorine, which can cause neorological and respiratory harm, or chloramine, which can be harmful to circulatory and respiratory systems. Chlorine combines with organic elements during the water treatment process to produce carcinogenic byproducts.

The best type of filter to remove chlorine and its byproducts is a combination carbon/KDF adsorption filter (which is a different chemical process than absorption), which range from shower and faucet filters to sink and whole-house filters, like those from Sweetwater. A regular carbon filter won’t remove chloramine, so look for a catalytic carbon filter instead.

If you only have one or two contaminants, a smaller unit, such as a countertop or under-the-sink filter, may meet your needs. To find a filter certified to remove the contaminants you’re most concerned about, visit the NSF’s online database.

Finally, if you find your water has serious safety issues, consider a multi-stage filter that can tackle a variety of contaminants. Many combine a variety of filter types. Sweetwater sells multi-stage whole-house or sink filters, for example, that combine KDF and carbon adsorption with ultraviolet light, among other steps—and it also sells customized filters.

Step Three: Look at the Labels on Water Filters

Some experts recommend looking for a water filter certified by NSF International, a nonprofit organization that conducts safety testing for the food and water industries. NSF tests and certifies water filters to ensure that they both meet NSF safety standards and are effective at removing contaminants as claimed by the manufacturer. Underwriters Laboratories and the Water Quality Association also offer similar certification, based on NSF standards.

NSF has different certifications, so when you read the label, first make sure it says the filter will remove the contaminants you’re most concerned about. A filter certified by NSF to remove chlorine isn’t going to be helpful if you need it to remove nitrates. Then, look for the NSF seal, Underwriters Laboratories’ “UL Water Quality” mark, or the Water Quality Association Gold Seal for added assurance that your filter will actually do what the box claims.

Safe Water for the Future

Filters aren’t perfect—they can be expensive and energy intensive, and the filter cartridges are nearly impossible to recycle. But when you compare throwing away a couple cartridges to the billions of water bottles we toss each year, filters are a preferable option. When it comes to ensuring better water for the future, here are the most important steps:

First, we need to stop drinking bottled water. It’s not any safer than tap, and it wastes a mind-boggling number of resources.

Then, we need to ask companies to take back and recycle their cartridges. Besides using up resources, filter cartridges trap and hold contaminants. If the cartridges are not disposed of in a sealed landfill, those contaminants could end up right back in the environment.

Brita—which sells a popular carbon adsorption pitcher filter, faucet-mounted filters, and cartridges for refrigerator filters does accept recycling shipments of Brita products. If you buy from another manufacturer, research whether their products can be recycled or email them and say you would like them to implement a recycling program.

Finally, US water treatment and distribution systems date back several decades, and they need repairs and upgrades to make water safer for for human and environmental health. While the EPA won’t attach a dollar amount, Dale Kemery, a former EPA spokesman, says more money is needed to make these upgrades. Food and Water Watch is demanding that Congress increase funding to secure our public water system.

That said, public utilities will be using treatment chemicals well into the future, and our systems may never be perfect. Take responsibility for your family’s health by carefully considering whether you need to take additional steps to make your water the healthiest it can be.

FEATURE ARTICLE - JULY/AUGUST 2007 (Updated 2023)

To find more screened green companies offering water filters, search "water purification" in the National Green Pages™.

One of the simplest pleasures in life is coming home from a stressful day of work and lighting an aromatherapy candle with a special scent intended to make you feel calm and relaxed. Unfortunately, that seemingly harmless candle could be filling the air in your home with harmful pollution and supporting the fossil fuels industry.   

Alternatives to toxic aromatherapy candles abound. For example, beeswax candles and soy candles are safer, greener options. With very little effort, you can fill your home with soothing scents without filling it with toxic gases. 

Is Something Wrong with My Candles?

The biggest issues with candles are petroleum-based wax and air pollution. 

Burning Oil, Now Inside Your Home

Avoid aromatherapy candles made of paraffin or gel, both petroleum byproducts. In all things, avoiding the fossil fuel industry when you can makes sense for living a green life. Just like if you don’t have to drive a car to get to your destination, don’t; if you don’t have to burn a petroleum-based candle, don’t.  

Vegetable-based waxes are becoming more and more common and are a great substitute for paraffin or gel wax. Because being greener is a selling point for many customers, it will usually be labeled—soy, vegetable, coconut are common labels you’ll see. Beeswax candles are also natural and renewable, and often smell great even without added scents. If the label says blend without noting what has been blended, or is unlabeled as to what type of wax, skip it, as it’s likely paraffin. Plant-based waxes burn at a lower temperature, meaning they will last longer and come from renewable sources.   

Polluting Indoor Air

One often-cited 2014 study concluded that “under normal conditions of use, scented candles do not pose known health risks to the consumer,” and even that carcinogenic chemicals that were released by burning the candles, including benzene and formaldehyde, were still less than half the recommended limits set by the World Health Organization. That study was peer-reviewed, but it was carried out by scientists who had affiliations with candle manufacturers, including SCI Johnson & Son, and Procter & Gamble.  

A 2015 study by university-affiliated researchers in South Korea found that scented candles release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) both before being lit and while lit, concluding that scented candles “should act as potent sources of VOC emission in indoor environments.” 

Exposure to VOCs can cause headaches or irritation to eyes, nose or throat, nausea, and even damage to the liver, kidneys, or central nervous system. Some VOCs are suspected or proven carcinogens. That means if you do choose to light candles in your home, be sure to vent the space after with a fan and/or open window, as you would for other VOC-emitting items, like a freshly painted room or gas stove.  

Besides endangering your health, soot from candles can cause damage to your walls, appliances, ductwork and even your personal “ductwork.” Soot can look like a black film around the top of the jar, on your walls, or even inside your nose if you have the candle lit too long and fall asleep, for example.  

Experts recommend trimming the wick of your candle to 1/8 or ¼ inch before every use, not using petroleum-based candles (which create more soot than natural wax candles), and not burning the candle for longer than recommended on the label—usually 3 hours. 

Do Scents Make Sense?

Many people are sensitive to synthetic scents—if that’s you, either skip candles altogether or go with unscented or naturally good-smelling, like beeswax, candles.  

In the New York Times, odor perception and irritation researcher Dr. Pamela Dalton says that human noses are more sensitive than we might think, and candles use concentration levels of fragrance chemicals in the equivalent ratio of a teaspoon of chemicals for an Olympic-sized swimming pool.  

What About the Wick?

Once upon a time, many scented candles on the market contained lead-core wicks. Fragrance oils soften the wax, so the manufacturers used lead to make the wicks stand firm. A candle with a lead-core wick releases five times the amount of lead considered hazardous for children and exceeds EPA pollution standards for outdoor air, says the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Exposure to high amounts of lead has been linked to hormone disruption, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, and numerous health problems. 

Lead wicks were banned by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission in 2003, but by 1974, the National Candle Association members had all voluntarily agreed to stop using lead wicks, including major brands like Yankee Candle.  

If you do have a candle from before 2003 in your home, you can still test for a lead wick by rubbing the tip of the wick of an un-burnt candle on a piece of paper. If it leaves a gray mark, like a pencil, the wick contains a lead core. If you have already burned a candle you suspect might have a lead wick, toss it out.  

Find safe candles from certified green businesses at our GreenPages.org.

Candle-Free Aromatherapy

If you can’t find the right nontoxic aromatherapy candle to get rid of tension headaches or rejuvenate your tired body, you may want to try using pure essential oils. Pure, organic oils can give you the same aromatherapy benefits as scented candles, and you can choose and blend your own scents. 

Essential oils are derived from plants and have been used for hundreds of years. That does not mean they are completely safe—some can be poisonous when absorbed through the skin or if aspirated. 

Many people love using essential oils in their homes for the scents they provide. They should be stored away from children and pets and used with caution around those family members and by pregnant people. 

Be sure to consult a reliable website, reference book, or qualified aromatherapist when bringing essential oils into your home. Once you’ve chosen your favorite oils blends, there are a few ways to release the scents in your home: 

• Use a diffuser. These are simple containers—most often made of glass, marble, or ceramic—which release the scent from essential oils when heated either with electricity or a small tea light candle. Usually, six to ten drops of essential oil in a diffuser is all it takes to scent a room. 
• Use a ring burner. These metal rings have a reservoir that holds a few drops of essential oil and will fit around a lightbulb, using the heat to disperse the oil’s scent. 
• Take a bath. Add five to ten drops of essential oils to a warm bath. Close the bathroom door and soak for 15 minutes. Remember, essential oils can mark plastic bathtubs, so be sure to clean the tub when you’re finished. 
• Make a spray. Blend ten drops of essential oil in seven tablespoons of water. Shake well before filling the sprayer. 

Whether you choose to go candle-free or opt for a nontoxic candle like 100% beeswax candles, you can relax knowing that these healthier alternatives will be easier on your lungs and the air in your home. 

In summary, to safely use scents at home:

• Skip oil-based paraffin and gel waxes and burn plant-based and beeswax candles only 
• Trim the wick to 1/8 or ¼ inch before every use 
• Don’t burn the candle longer than recommended 
• Diffuse essential oils at home for aromatherapy without the air pollution 
• Read up on essential oils’ safe use before bringing them home 

Along with helping you live green, for over 40 years, Green America has been working for safe food, a healthy climate, fair labor, responsible finance, and social justice.

My colleagues Martha van Gelder and Tracy Fernandez Rysavy have been sharing their experience with kicking the sugar habit on this blog for the past week or so.

We’ve all been delving deeply into sugar issues recently, working to prepare “Sickeningly Sweet,” the latest issue of our Green American magazine, all about the American sugar habit, and its effects on our bodies and our health.

For my part, I confess to being a little stunned at the amount of sugar Americans consume per capita, partially because I don’t tend to consume that much sugar myself. I don’t keep any sugar-boosted foods in my house — no soda pop, no sugary breakfast cereals, no sweet treats like boxed cookies or or ice cream, and no processed snacks with hidden sugars. I don’t even put sugar in my coffee, and if a recipe calls for a bit of sweetness, I’m likely to either leave the sugar out, or replace with a few drops of organic honey, maple syrup, or molasses.

All that being said: I do have sugar in my house. I share an apartment with two other housemates, one of whom loves to bake. Among the staple foods lining the shelves of our kitchen, we’ve got a big metal can full of sugar. And while there are many staples that rarely cross our threshold unless they’re Fair Trade certified — coffee, rice, and olive oil come to mind — I’d never made a Fair Trade commitment for the sugar in my house until I researched the sugar supply chain for the Green American.

While much of the sugar consumed in the US was grown here, much of THAT sugar is controlled by Monsanto, and its patented genetically modified herbicide-resistant sugar beet. I don’t really want that kind of sugar in my home. Plus, sugar production worldwide can be tainted with various environmental and social ills, from the destruction of the Everglades in Florida, to labor-rights abuses in the Caribbean, Latin America, Africa, and Asia.

Looks like I’m going to need to add another Fair Trade choice to my household’s shopping list.

And while Fair Trade sugar can cost a little bit more than a conventional bag of cheap sugar from the supermarket, you know that the extra premium embedded in the price of that sugar is going to provide a decent living for farmers, environmental protections for their communities, and a better life for the children of farming families. Plus, if you’re trying to cut down on sugar for your health, paying true-cost for a bag of sugar can be a blessing. You could spend no more per month on sugar than before, but resolve to purchase only fairly traded, organic, GMO-free sugar. Your budget will go untouched, you’ll bring somewhat less sugar into your house to start with, and your spending will benefit people and the planet.

Here are some sources for Fair Trade, organic, & GMO-free sugar: Alter-Eco, Dean’s Beans, Frontier Natural Products, Grain Place Foods.

Subscribe to the Green American.
Your subscription helps power the work of our Fair Trade program,
GMO Inside program, Climate Action program, and more.

Dean Cycon (center right) of Dean’s Beans poses in the sugarcane fields in Peru with Esperanza Castilo (manager of the Pangoa cooperative), and with sugar farmers Miguel and Raul (far left and far right)

A small bit of light came out of Bangladesh today in the wake of the Rana Plaza building collapse that has to date killed at least 244 people—most of them garment factory workers making clothes for US retailers. The CBC reports that 40 people have been found alive, and local rescue workers hope that number will rise as their efforts continue.

Perhaps the worst part of this story is the fact that police had ordered the Rana Plaza building to be shuttered a day before the collapse, due to deep, dangerous-looking cracks in the building’s structure. But the garment factory owners on the fourth floor of the building ignored the police instructions and ordered their more than 2,000 workers back inside to sew.

According to the CBC, the fourth-floor garment factories made clothes for American retailers including Walmart, The Children’s Place, Dress Barn, and Benetton.

“Our deepest sympathies go out to the families of workers lost in this tragic event,” Kalpona Akter, executive director of the Bangladesh Center for Worker Solidarity, told our allies at the International Labor Rights Forum (ILRF). “It must be said, these tragedies can be prevented by multinational corporations like Walmart and Gap that operate in Bangladesh. Because of these companies’ negligence and willful ignorance, garment workers are in danger every day because of the unsafe working conditions. … The largest retailers in the world hold tremendous power to transform conditions for garment workers—mostly young women—in Bangladesh. Today’s news is yet another reminder that multinational companies must immediately sign onto and implement the Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement, a legally-binding program with worker representation and fair pricing for mandatory building repairs and renovations. This safety agreement is the first step toward ensuring no more lives are lost.”

Green America has joined with the Bangladesh Center for Worker Solidarity and the ILRF to call on US clothing companies to sign the Bangladesh Fire and Building Safety Agreement. Support our action asking Gap clothing to sign the agreement—which it had publicly promised to do but then reneged on that promise. 29 workers were killed at a Gap supplier garment factory in Bangladesh in 2010. Where Gap goes, other companies may follow to avoid public pressure.

Meanwhile, we’re urging Green Americans to direct their clothing budgets to responsible companies that are committed to protecting workers all across the supply chain. In our July/August 2012 issue of the Green American, we ranked some of the top choices as follows:

GOOD CHOICES: If you need something new in a pinch, perhaps for a gift, national retailers Hanna Andersson, Nau, Patagonia, and Eileen Fisher have made strong commitments to fair labor and environmental sustainability. Eileen Fisher, for example, makes more than a quarter of its products from eco-friendly fibers like organic cotton that’s certified less-toxic by Oeko-Tex and certified both less-toxic and made through fair labor by GOTS. (Click here to learn more about eco-fabrics and certifications.) Its Peruvian cotton products come via a supply chain that adheres to Fair Trade Federation standards. And it has a program to take back gently used Eileen Fisher clothing for resale.

BETTER CHOICES: Certified Green America Green Business Network (GBN) members go the extra mile to protect workers and the planet. ShariBe makes soft, lovely women’s clothing (in regular and plus sizes) from eco fabrics like organic cotton in sweatshop-free facilities in the USA. And Stay Vocal takes in used and remaindered T-shirts, prints sustainable-minded messages on them, and resells them (including a men’s large navy T-shirt in which 100 percent of the profits will support those most affected by the recent bombing in Boston). Go deeper, and you’ll find all of the clothing companies listed at GreenPages.org to be deep green throughout their operations. A purchase from a GBN member business supports the US economy at its best and greenest.

BEST CHOICES: Buying used saves precious resources, keeps old items out of landfills, and saves you money, making it the best option of all when it comes to restocking your wardrobe. In addition to resale clothing boutiques, secondhand stores like Goodwill, and garage sales, there are several options to help you buy used. One of my personal favorites is ThredUp.com. You can send them a bag of used children’s clothing (still in good shape), and the ThredUp staff will assess the clothing’s value and send you a percentage of the sale. You can find high-quality used items to buy on the site at garage-sale prices, as well. Adults in the market for new-to-them clothes can consult sites like Refashioner.com, DignSwap.com, Swapstyle.com, and more.

To find out everything you ever wanted to know about the problems with conventional clothes and how to find the best options, including more resources for buying used, check out the “Green Fashion” issue of the Green American. In fact, as a happy spring present, here’s a FREE link to the entire digital “Green Fashion” issue.

We also have our popular Guide to Ending Sweatshops for more on what you can do prevent labor abuses and support workers around the world.

To get the Green American regularly—in either digital or paper format, or both—join Green America here.

Last Friday, the US State Department released its 2014 Global Trafficking in Persons Report—an annual report that documents human trafficking around the world and each country’s efforts to combat the issue. In this report, State downgraded Thailand to Tier 3, demonstrating that the Thai government is not compliant with the minimum standards of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, particularly with regard to its treatment of migrant workers. This is especially evident in the fishing sector.

In fact, there are an estimated 3-4 million migrant workers in Thailand. The majority of them, 80 percent, came from Myanmar and work in the most dangerous, dirty jobs, including seafood harvesting and processing, manufacturing, and domestic work.

This decision came after Green America and our allies sent a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry, urging him to make this decision so that economic sanctions could be imposed to influence the Thai government’s efforts in preventing human trafficking.

You can read the original letter we sent to Secretary Kerry as well as the thank you letter we sent with our allies on Friday applauding this decision.

While it’s not good news that Thailand has fallen to Tier 3 status, we hope that this decision will lead to urgent action in Thailand to improve the situation for migrant workers.

In the last year, reports from, CNN,BBC,Reuters, The Associated PressandThe Guardian have drawn unprecedented attention to the issue and consumer pressure campaigns have also launched to push companies to be accountable as well.

We believe the Tier 3 ranking, as well as the research and recommendations contained in the report, will be an important informational tool for international and Thai institutions, companies and investors that continue to press Thai authorities to move beyond their current approach. Its our hope that by next year Thailand can be revoked of its Tier 3 status.

When you shop for new clothes, a number of factors can affect the social and environmental impacts of your purchases. For example, about 14.2 million workers worldwide are trapped in forced and exploitative working conditions, including those in clothing manufacture, according to a June 2012 report from the International Labour Organization (ILO).

Also, toxic pesticides can harm farm workers and the Earth; clothing dyes may contain heavy metals (look for low-impact dyes); and many companies apply toxic finishes to promote fire-, wrinkle-, and stain resistance. Clothing made from petroleum-based polyester has a high carbon footprint, and clothing made from rayon requires a toxic chemcial soup to turn wood pulp into fabric.

To find the greenest clothing when you shop, look for these fabrics and labels:

Look for These Eco-Friendly Fabrics

Bamboo: This hardy plant grows quickly, generally with few chemical inputs. However, toxic chemicals may be used to turn the plant into fabric. The Federal Trade Commission mandates that companies using this process label their products “bamboo-based rayon” rather than just “bamboo.”

Organic cotton: More than 25 percent of the world’s pesticides are used in conventional cotton production. Organic cotton is grown without toxic, synthetic chemical inputs.

Industrial hemp: Hemp is rapidly renewable and requires little or no pesticides.

Recycled polyester: This fiber is made from cast-off polyester fabric and soda bottles, resulting in a carbon footprint that is 75-percent lower than virgin polyester. Recycled polyester contains toxic antimony, but some companies are working on removing it from their fabrics.

Soy cashmere/silk: This fabric is made from soy protein fiber left over after processing soybeans into food. The soy may be genetically engineered unless noted on the label.

TENCEL: Like rayon, Tencel is made from wood pulp. The difference is that it uses Forest Stewardship Council certified wood pulp and less-toxic chemicals in a closed-loop process.

Wool: Wool is renewable, fire-resistant, and doesn’t need chemical inputs. Look for chlorine-free wool from humanely-treated animals.

Look for These Labels

BLUESIGN
Ensures that a piece of clothing is not exposed to harmful chemicals throughout the supply chain, from raw materials to finished product.

CERTIFIED ORGANIC
Ensures that thec clothing's raw materialswere grown without chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Does not prevent toxic finishes.

GOTS ORGANIC
The Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) requires clothing be 95 percent organic, with no toxic dyes or finishes. Supply chains must comply with GOTS' waste and labor standards as well.

OEKO -TEX
This independent certification system limits the use of toxins in everything from raw materials to finished clothes.

SA8000
A designation from the non-governmental organization SAI, which is applied to factories and farms to show they meet standards for social responsibility and labor rights.

UNION-MADE PRIVATE LABELS
These labels indicate that your clothes were made by workers who were allowed to organize and advocate for better wages and working conditions.

FAIR TRADE
(Fair Trade Certified, FLO International, Fair Trade Federation, IMO Fair for Life)
These independent certification and membership systems ensure that workers who grow raw materials or who make clothing earn a living wage, labor under healthy conditions, and earn a premium for community development

During WWII, the British Ministry of Information released a pamphlet titled “Make Do and Mend.” It provided tips on how to be both frugal and stylish in times of harsh rationing. Readers were advised to create pretty “decorative patches” to cover holes in warn garments, unpick old sweaters to reknit into new styles, turn men’s clothes into women’s, as well as darn, alter, and protect against the “moth menace.”

Times have changed. We’ve lost those skills—seven out of ten young adults don’t know how to sew on a button. Often, clothes end up in the discard pile because they need a simple mend.

If you are one of the seven, Martha Stewart has an extended list of how-to tutorials on marthastewart.com under “Homekeeping Solutions.” The site has tips on sewing on a button, patching a hole, fixing a hem, even darning a sock.

iFixIt.com has repair manuals for almost every item in your closet.

Alternatively, your neighborhood dry cleaner is also usually a tailor who can do repairs at affordable prices.

Here are some online salvage and repair services that can help preserve the life of your favorite pieces of clothing:

• Cashmere: Stella Neptune—Sells iron-on cashmere patches in unique shapes and styles for self-mending.
• Denim: Denim Therapy— Ship them your favorite jeans, and they will repair and reconstruct.
• Knits and Sweaters: Alterknit New York—Mail them your treasured knits or sweater to have moth holes, burn holes, and tears repaired by reknitting. Other types of damage like snags, runs, and breaks in seams are also repaired.
• Leather Coats and Jackets: Leather CARE Specialists—will repair, re-dye, and restore all jackets.
• Shoes: NuShoe—are masters at handcrafted shoe or boot renewal; they also rebuild shoes.

Think your garment is beyond repair but you are loath to part with it? What about a refit? These designers and brands that will help you reshape existing pieces into new treasures:

• Deborah Lindquist (also in Special Occasions) will take your cashmere sweater and design a unique, reincarnated, bespoke sweater for you, your child or a beloved pet.
• Shannon South (also in Handbags) runs Remade USA, a custom service that repurposes individual vintage leather jackets into handbags.
• Project Repat will help you wrap yourself in your T-shirt memories. Send them your collection of T-shirts, and they’ll send back a quilt or blanket.

image: Magnifeco book cover

Kate Black has lived and worked in the major fashion centers of the world and written over 1,000 articles about designers and ethical fashion from her global perspective. She is the founder and editor-in-chief of Magnifeco.com, the digital source for eco-fashion and sustainable living. Kate is also the founder of EcoSessions, a global platform bringing together designers, industry, and consumers to discuss sustainable change.

Adapted with permission from Magnifeco,Your Head-to-Toe Guide to Ethical
Fashion and Non-toxic Beauty, by Kate Black (New Society Publishers, Gabriola
Island 2015).

This spring, Green America’s End Smartphone Sweatshops campaign, in partnership with China Labor Watch (CLW), called on Apple to remove toxic chemicals including benzene and n-hexane from its supplier factories in China. Only five months into the campaign, Apple announced in August that it would “explicitly prohibit the use of benzene and n-hexane” at 22 of its final-assembly supplier factories.

“If you’ve ever wondered if signing a petition can really make a difference, now you know. With 23,000 signatures since March of 2014, we’ve been able to push one of the biggest companies in the world to change its practices,” says Elizabeth O’Connell, Green America’s campaigns director.

A known carcinogen, benzene can cause leukemia, a blood cancer, and leukopenia, a dangerously low white blood cell count.The chemical n-hexane is a neurotoxicant that can cause nerve damage and paralysis after long-term exposure. As reported in the April/May Green American, workers in electronics supplier factories—including those making Apple products—use both chemicals to clean touch screens. Undercover CLW representatives have found such workers using little to no protective equipment, with inadequate safety training.

In a statement released August 13th, Lisa Jackson, former EPA Secretary and current Apple vice-president of environmental affairs, stated that Apple had investigated 22 final-assembly supplier factories that make iPhones, iPads, iPods, and Mac computers, “and found no evidence of workers’ health being put at risk from exposure to [benzene and n-hexane].”

O’Connell, however, says the campaign’s work is not over. “Benzene and n-hexane are still allowed in factories that produce the components for iPhones and iPads,” she sas. “Beyond benzene and n-hexane, there are thousands of chemicals used in electronics manufacturing—some which are largely untested—and many chemicals used by Apple suppliers remain undisclosed. Apple needs to do more to protect workers.”

With production set to ramp up this fall with the release of the iPhone 6, Green America and CLW are now calling on Apple to extend the chemical ban to substances other than benzene and n-hexane, and to all of its supplier factories, including early-production facilities where chemical usage and safety measures are less controlled.

In July, the campaign also began targeting Samsung, after news broke that five children below the age of 16 and many minors between 16 and 18 were found working in Shinyang Electronics Co., Ltd., one of its Chinese suppliers. Workers are also exposed in Samsung’s factories to toxins like benzene and n-hexane.

Sign our new petition to Apple, as well as our petition to Samsung and demand they take action to protect all workers across their supply chains.

Green America and China Labor Watch (CLW) today released the findings of an undercover investigation we conducted in August 2014 at one of Apple’s 2nd tier supplier factories: Catcher Technology in Suqian.

Recently, Dan Watch and Electronics Watch released Winds of Change, a report which details the harsh working conditions of the electronics manufacturing sector, particularly the problems caused by occupational exposure to dangerous chemicals.

The report compiles all known cases of occupational illness among people who have worked at Samsung since 2006/2007. The total number of illnesses is likely much greater due to the fact that unlike work-related accidents, the symptoms of the illness will present over a long time span, making it difficult to pinpoint the specific time and place where the cause of health deterioration was encountered.

Victims of occupational illness in South Korea

• 289 South Korean workers in the semiconductor industry who were diagnosed with various forms of leukemia, multiple sclerosis and aplastic anemia.
• 233 of the cancer patients were employed at South Korean Samsung subsidiaries, while the other 56 worked at other electronics manufacturers.
• 119 have died.
• 98 of the workers who died have been employed at Samsung subsidiaries.

(Data collected by SHARPS)

In addition to these illnesses, workers have encountered reproductive problems. One worker profiled, MiYeon Kim, had difficulty getting pregnant and later got cancer and had to have an involuntary abortion because of cancer complications. Kim worked at a Samsung semiconductor plant for 15 years and 2 months.

The report also included the unfortunate, but not uncommon, story of sick employee from Shenzhen, China who was handling toxins without adequate protective equipment. (His suit and mask only protected the product, not the person.) This 21 year old was hospitalized for ten months after being exposed to n-hexane on the job for six to seven months. Within his workshop of 16 people, who made iPhone screen replacements, 5 were poisoned and hospitalized.

Winds of Change is the latest revelation of the severe health and safety risks effecting workers in the electronics manufacturing sector. Beyond health problems, it also sheds light on the the weak or absent ability for workers to organization in this sector.

Read the full report>>

Take action to push Samsung to improve worker health and safety>>

Finding Fair Trade products has never been easier. Not only has the steady growth of the Fair Trade market brought more and more products into supermarkets and local retail stores, but the internet has brought almost every possible Fair Trade product within the reach of a mouse click.

Below is a list of Fair Trade retailers in the United States. The companies on this list are either part of our Green Business Network selling Fair Trade Certified™ products (and listed in our National Green Pages™), a member of the Fair Trade Federation, or both.

FRUIT

Oké USA/Equal Exchange,
West Bridgewater, MA
774/776-7400, www.beyondthepeel.com

Interrupcion* Fair Trade, Brooklyn, NY
718/417-4076, www.interrupcionfairtrade.com

Visit www.FairTradeUSA.com to find a local food co-op near you offering
Fair Trade fruit.

RICE

Alter Eco,
San Francisco, CA
415/701-1212,
www.altereco-usa.com

Eighth Wonder,
Ulm, MT
406/866-3340,
www.heirloomrice.com

SPORTS BALLS

Global Exchange Fair Trade Store,
San Francisco, CA
800/505-4410,
www.globalexchangestore.org

SUGAR

Alter Eco,
San Francisco, CA
415/701-1212,
www.altereco-usa.com

Cocoa Camino/La Siembra Cooperative, Inc.,
Ottowa, Ontario, Canada
613/235-6122,
www.cocoacamino.com

Dean’s Beans,
Orange, MA
800/325-3008, www.deansbeans.com

Equal Exchange,
West Bridgewater, MA
774/776- 7400, www.equalexchange.coop

Food for Thought,
Honor, MI
888/935-2748, www.foodforthought.net
(sells organic jams made with Fair Trade sugar)

Frontier Natural Products Co-op,
Norway, IA, 800/669-3275,
www.frontiercoop.com

SPICES

Frontier Natural Products Co-op,
Norway, IA, 800/669-3275,
www.frontiercoop.com

VANILLA

Frontier Natural Products Co-op,
Norway, IA, 800/669-3275,
www.frontiercoop.com

WINE & SPIRITS

FAIR.
www.fairtradespirits.com

OLIVE OIL

Alter Eco,
San Francisco, CA
415/701-1212,
www.altereco-usa.com

Canaan Fair Trade
Camas, WA
360/980-2580
www.canaanfairtrade.com

Holy Land Olive Oil,
Berkeley, CA
510/830-8804
www.holylandoliveoil.com

Interrupcion* Fair Trade, Brooklyn, NY
718/417-4076, www.interrupcionfairtrade.com

COFFEE

The following list includes roasters and local coffee-shops that offer online ordering; many of them offer Fair Trade tea • and
chocolate • as well.

Alter Eco,
San Francisco, CA
415/701-1212, www.altereco-usa.com • •
(also sells Fair Trade sugar, rice, quinoa and olive oil)

A&E Custom Coffee Roastery
Amherst, NH
603/578-3338 www.aeroastery.com

Bean North Coffee Roasting Company,
Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada
867/667-4145, www.beannorth.com • •

Café Campesino,
Americus, GA,
888/532-4728, www.cafecampesino.com •

Café Fair,
Madison, WI,
800/876-1986, www.cafefair.com

Café Mam/Royal Blue Organics,
Eugene, OR,
888/223-3626, www.cafemam.com

Caffe Ibis Coffee Roasting Company,
Logan, UT, 888/740-4777, www.caffeibis.com

Coffee and Tea, Ltd.,
Minneapolis, MN
612/920-6344, www.coffeeandtealtd.com •

Coffee Exchange, Inc.,
Providence, RI,
401/273-1198, www.coffeexchange.com •

Conscious Coffees,
Boulder, CO,
800/365-8616, , www.consciouscoffees.com

Conscious Cup Coffee Roastery and Café,
Crystal Lake, IL,
815/356-0115,
www.consciouscoffees.com

Cooperative Coffees,
Americus, GA
229/924-3035, www.coopcoffees.com

Dean’s Beans,
Orange, MA,
800/325-3008,
www.deansbeans.com •
(also sells Fair Trade sugar)

Earth-Friendly Coffee,
Denver, CO,
866/807-6089 , www.earthfriendlycoffee.com

Equal Exchange,
West Bridgewater, MA,
774/776-7400, www.equalexchange.coop• •
(also sells Fair Trade sugar and bananas )

Equator Estate Coffees and Teas, Inc.,
San Rafael, CA,
800/809-7687,
www.equatorcoffees.com •

Fair Trade Coffee Company, Westfield, NJ,
800/909-8575, www.fairtradecoffee.org

Frontier Natural Products Co-op,
Norway, IA,
800/669-3275,
www.frontiercoop.com
(also sells Fair Trade sugar and vanilla)

Global Exchange Fair Trade Store,
San Francisco, CA
800/505-4410,
www.globalexchangestore.org • •
(also sells Fair Trade crafts and sports balls)

Green Mountain Coffee Roasters,
Waterbury, VT,
866/639-2326,
www.greenmountaincoffee.com

Grounds for Change,
Poulsbo, WA,
800/796-6820, www.groundsforchange.com •

Heine Brothers’ Coffee, Louisville, KY,
502/802-9803, www.heinebroscoffee.com

Higher Ground Roasters,
Leeds, AL,
800/794-8575, www.highergroundroasters.com

Higher Grounds Trading Company,
Traverse City, MI
877/825-2262,
www.highergroundstrading.com •

Just Coffee,
Sonora, Mexico,
011-52-633-121-60-42, www.justcoffee.org

Larry’s Beans,
Raleigh, NC,
919/828-1234, www.larrysbeans.com

Moka Joe Certified Organic Coffee,
Bellingham, WA,
360/714-1953,
www.mokajoe.com

Montana Coffee Traders, Whitefish, MT,
800/345-5282, www.coffeetraders.com

Mother Earth Coffee Company,
Kansas City, MO,
913/722-5711,
www.motherearthcoffeeco.com

New Harvest Coffee Roasters,
Pawtucket, RI,
866/438-1999,
www.newharvestcoffee.com

Peace Coffee,
Minneapolis, MN
888/324-7872, www.peacecoffee.com

Philly Fair Trade Roasters
Philadelphia, PA
267/270-2563
www.phillyfairtrade.com

Providence Coffee,
Faribault, MN,
507/412-1733, www.providencecoffee.com • •

Pura Vida Coffee Company, Seattle, WA,
877/469-1431, www.puravidacoffee.com

Santa Cruz Coffee Roasting,
Watsonville, CA,
888/ 725-2827,
www.santacruzcoffee.com

Thanksgiving Coffee Company,
Fort Bragg, CA,
800/648-6491,
www.thanksgivingcoffee.com

Traditions Café & World Folk Art,
Olympia, WA
360/705-2819, www.traditionsfairtrade.com

CHOCOLATE

Alter Eco,
San Francisco, CA
415/701-1212,
www.altereco-usa.com

Bean North Coffee Roasting Company,
Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada
867/667-4145, www.beannorth.com

Camino,
Ottowa, Ontario, Canada
613/235-6122
www.lasiembra.com/camino

Dean’s Beans,
Orange, MA,
800/325-3008,
www.deansbeans.com

Divine Chocolate USA,
Washington, DC,
202/332-8913, www.divinechocolateusa.com

Equal Exchange,
West Bridgewater, MA,
774/776-7400, www.equalexchange.coop

Global Exchange
Fair Trade Store,
San Francisco, CA
800/505-4410,
www.globalexchangestore.org

Grounds for Change,
Poulsbo, WA,
800/796-6820, www.groundsforchange.com

La Chiwinha,
San Juan, Puerto Rico
787/925-0707, www.lachiwinha.com

Madecasse,
Brooklyn, NY
917/382-2020, www.madecasse.com

SERRV International,
Madison, WI
800/422-5915 , www.serrv.org/divine

Shaman Chocolates,
Soquel, CA,
877/990-3337, www.shamanchocolates.com

Sjaak's Organic Chocolates,
Petaluma, CA,
707/775-2434,
www.sjaaks.com

Taraluna,
Eureka, CA, 877/325-9129,
www.taraluna.com

Travel Chocolate,
New York, NY,
718/841-7030, www.travelchocolate.com

Theo Chocolate,
Seattle, WA,
206/632-5100, www.theochocolate.com

TEA

Aha-Yes!,
Mountain View, CA
650/641-0003,
www.aha-yes.com

Alter Eco,
San Francisco, CA,
415/701-1212, www.altereco-usa.com

Choice Organic Teas/ Granum, Inc.,
Seattle, WA,
206/525-0051,
www.choiceorganicteas.com

Coffee and Tea, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN,
612/920-6344, www.coffeeandtealtd.com

Davidson’s Organic Tea, Sparks, NV,
800/882-5888, www.davidsonstea.com

Eco Teas,
Ashland, OR,
866/972-6879,
www.ecoteas.com

Equal Exchange,
West Bridgewater, MA,
774/776-7400, www.equalexchange.coop

Equator Estate Coffees and Teas, Inc.,
San Rafael, CA,
800/809-7687,
www.equatorcoffees.com

Frontier Natural Products Co-op,
Norway, IA, 800/669-3275,
www.frontiercoop.com

Garuda International,
Salem, OR,
www.garudainternational.com

Grounds for Change,
Poulsbo, WA,
800/796-6820, www.groundsforchange.com

Higher Grounds Trading Company,
Traverse City, MI,
877/825-2262,
www.highergroundstrading.com

Honest Tea,
Bethesda, MD
800/865-4736, www.honesttea.com

La Chiwinha,
San Juan, Puerto Rico
787/925-0707,
www.lachiwinha.com

Lake Champlain Chocolates
Burlington, VT
800/465-5909,
www.lakechamplainchocolates.com/

Light of Day Organics,
Traverse City, MI,
231/228-7234,
www.lightofdayorganics.com

Numi Organic Tea,
Oakland, CA,
888/404-6864 ,
www.numitea.com

Rishi Tea,
Milwaukee, WI, 414/747-4001
www.rishi-tea.com

SerendipiTea,
Manhasset, NY, 888/TEA-LIFE
www.serendipitea.com

Taraluna,
Eureka, CA, 877/325-9129,
www.taraluna.com

Zhena’s Gypsy Tea,
Ojai, CA,
800/448-0803,
www.gypsytea.com

APPAREL
The following businesses specialize in Fair Trade apparel. Throughout the “Home Décor, Etc." section (below) you will find businesses that offer apparel selections as part of a broader product line.

Ananse Village,
Fort Bragg, CA
877/242-4467, www.anansevillage.com

Avatar,
Santa Cruz, CA,
800/443-7668
www.avatarimports.net

Casa Bonampak,
San Francisco, CA
415/642-4079, www.casabonampak.com

Cheppu Himal,
Carmel Valley, CA
831/659-0390, www.cheppu.com

Colores del Pueblo,
Houston, TX,
432/247-1407, www.coloresdelpueblo.org

eShopAfrica.com,
Accra, Ghana,
www.eShopAfrica.com

Fair Anita,
Minneapolis, MN,
612/524-9570
http://www.fairanita.com/

Fair Trade Winds,
www.fairtradewinds.net

Fibre Athletics,
https://fibreathletics.com/

Ganesh Himal,
Spokane, WA
509/448-6561,
www.ganeshhimaltrading.com

GREENOLA Style,
Chicago, IL
888/331-0553,
https://greenolastyle.com/

Global Mamas,
Minneapolis, MN,
800/338-3032, www.globalmamas.org

Just Apparel,
Boston, MA,
203/903-2879, www.justapparel.org

Kusikuy,
Brattleboro, VT,
866/587-4589,
www.kusikuy.org

Lanart International,
Huntersville, NC,
877/257-2228,
www.lanart.net

MadeFAIR,
Denver, CO
www.lanart.net

Mata Traders,
Chicago, IL
773/944-5418, www.matatraders.com

Oliberte,
Ontario, CA,
905/901-3660,
www.oliberte.com

Raven + Lily,
Austin, TX
737/209-1072
www.ravenandlily.com

Rupalee Exclusifs,
Wyncote, PA
215/576-7188,
www.rupalee.com

Sakaad,
Alexandria, VA,
866/499-4995,
www.sakaad.com

Sevya,
Charleston, SC,
303/440-4900,
www.sevya.com

Taraluna,
Eureka, CA,
877/325-9129,
www.taraluna.com

Traditions Café & world Folk Art,
Olympia, WA
360/705-2819, www.traditionsfairtrade.com

Unique Batik,
Raleigh, NC
919/856-0448, www.uniquebatik.us

Yellow Label Kids,
San Rafael, CA,
415/847-6901, www.yellowlabelkids.com

HOME DÉCOR, JEWELRY, HANDICRAFTS, AND MORE
The following businesses offer a wide range of products, including jewelry, accessories, textiles, toys, home furnishings, baskets, artwork, stationery, and more. Businesses offering apparel (•), greeting cards (•), sports balls(•), and musical instruments (•) are marked as such.

Seven Hopes United - Fair Trade Gifts

San Diego, CA
347/746-7378
www.sevenhopesunited.com

7 Loaves,
Grand Blanc, MI,
734/786-8223,
www.7loaves.com •

A Thread of Hope,
Brookline, MA
617/308-7026, www.athreadofhope.org

African Market Baskets,
Boulder, CO
800/766-6049, www.basketafrica.com

Ananse Village,
Fort Bragg, CA,
877/242-4467, www.anansevillage.com • •

Asha Imports,
Harrison, AR,
888/549-3416, www.ashaimports.com

Au Lac Designs Ltd.,
Hanoi, Vietnam
(84) 4625 81474, aulacdesigns.com

Basket Africa,
Broomfield, CO,
800/766-6049, www.basketafrica.com

Baskets of Africa,
Albuquerque, NM
800/504-4656, www.basketsofafrica.com

Baskets of Cambodia,
Lynnwood, WA
866/774-8800, www.basketsofcambodia.com

Bead for Life,
Boulder, CO,
808/339-5901, www.beadforlife.org

The Blessing Basket Project,
St. Louis, MO
888/618-1503, www.blessingbasket.org

Bridge for Africa,
San Francisco, CA,
415/244-0604, www.bridgeforafrica.org

Cadeaux du Monde,
Newport, RI
401/848-0550, www.cadeauxdumonde.com

Cards from Africa,
Kigale, Rwanda
www.cardsfromafrica.com •

Cebra,
Norfolk NR231HF, UK
www.cebraonline.com

Clean & Green Trading Co.,
Felton, CA,
888-873-4800, www.cleangreentradingco.com

Cojolya,
Doral, FL,
www.cojolya.org •

Community Friendly Movement,
New Delhi, India,
www.whycfm.org

Corazon Fair Trade,
Houston, TX,
713-526-6591, www.corazonfairtrade.com •

Crossroads Trade,
Arlington, MA,
617/975-2001, www.crossroadstrade.com •

Didi Bahini,
Chelsea, QC,
819/827-3066,
www.didibahini.ca • •

Dsenyo,
New York, NY
720/224-8649,
www.dsenyo.com

Dunitz and Company,
Hollywood, CA
800/870-4042,
www.dunitz.com

dZi: The Tibet Collection,
East Hampton, MA,
800/318-5857,
www.dzi.com

Eastern Art Arcade,
Rolling Meadows, IL
800/443-1334, www.easternartarcade.com

El Quetzal,
Seattle, WA,
206/723-1913,
www.elquetzal.com •

Eternal Threads,
Abilene, TX
888/487-4549, www.eternalthreads.com

Expo Peru Collection,
Norwood, MN,
612/414-3851, www.expoperucollection.com

Fair Anita,
Minneapolis, MN,
612/524-9570
http://www.fairanita.com/

Fair Earth,
Chicago, IL
630/532-7050, www.ourfairearth.com

Fair Trade Winds,
Bar Harbor, ME,
207/288-0056, www.fairtradewinds.net • •

Gifts With a Cause,
San Diego, CA
858/334-8308, http://www.giftswithacause.com/

Gifts With Humanity,
Edgewater, FL,
866/468-3438, www.giftswithhumanity.com • •

Global Girlfriend, LLC,
Seattle, WA
888/355-4321, www.globalgirlfriend.com

Global Goods Partners,
New York, NY,
212/461-3647, www.globalgoodspartners.org

Global Hands—A Fair Trade Shop LLC,
Lake Geneva, WI,
262/248-6920 www.globalhandsfairtrade.com

Global Sistergoods,
Portland, OR,
503/285-6780, www.globalsistergoods.com •

Good Weave,
Washington, DC
202/234-9050, www.goodweave.org

Greenheart,
Chicago, IL,
312/264-1625, www.greenheartshop.org • • •

Jamtown,
Seattle, WA,
888/526-8696, www.jamtown.com •

Karma Market,
San Diego, CA,
619/501-1206, www.thekarmamarket.com

Kindred Handcrafts,
Santa Rosa, CA
707/579-1459, www.kindredhandcrafts.com

Kizuri,
Spokane, WA
509.464.7677, www.kizurispokane.com

La Chiwinha,
San Juan, Puerto Rico
787/925-0707, www.lachiwinha.com

Lucia’s Imports,
Lexington, KY
859/537-6502, www.luciasimports.com

Lucuma Designs Folk Art Gallery,
Sarasota, FL,
800/952-1810, www.lucuma.com

MacroSun International,
St. Louis, MO,
888/962-6278, www.macrosun.com •

Malia Designs,
Chicago, IL
773/857-0779, www.maliadesigns.com

Mango Tree Imports,
Ballston Spa, NY,
518/288-3554,
www.mangotreeimports.com

Matr Boomie,
Austin, TX
512/535-5228, http://matrboomie.com/

Matur Suksema,
Kenmore, WA
206/718-3029, www.matursuksema.com

Manos de Madres,
Memphis, TN,
901/680-9889, www.manosdemadres.org •

Mariposa Indigenous Art,
Friday Harbor, WA,
360/378- 9425, www.mariposaimports.com

Maya Traditions,
San Francisco, CA,
415/587-2172, www.mayatraditions.com

MayaWorks,
Chicago, IL,
312/243-8050,
www.mayaworks.org

Mercado Global, Inc.,
New Haven, CT,
203/772-4292, www.mercadoglobal.org

Mira Ethnicity LLC,
Pittsburgh, PA
412/849-0893,
www.shopmira.com

Mountcastle International Trading Co.,
St. Pete Beach, FL,
800/343-5844
www.mountcastleinternational.com

Mr. Ellie Pooh,
Brooklyn, NY
701/746-1489, www.mrelliepooh.com

My Bolga Baskets,
Orange City, FL,
386/801-4513, www.mybolgabaskets.com

Ojoba Collective,
Lopez Island, WA,
888/510-7432, www.ojobacollective.com • •

The One Eyed Turtle LLC,
East Windsor, NJ
609/865-2070, www.theoneeyedturtle.com

One World Projects,
Batavia, NY,
585/343-4490, www.oneworldprojects.com

Otavalito,
Saugatuck, MI
269/857-7199,
www.otavalito.com

Paisley Valley,
Sterling, VA,
703/636-6368, www.paisleyvalley.com •

Partners for Just Trade,
St. Louis, MO,
314/ 707-2831,
www.partnersforjusttrade.org

Pueblito,
Toronto, ON,
888/326-5395,
www.pueblito.ca

Puresa Organics,
Boca Raton, FL,
561/ 826-7527, www.puresa.org

Rishashay,
Missoula, MT,
800/517-3311,
www.rishashay.com

River Jhelum Handmade Wool Rugs,
Concord, MA,
978/621-6073
www.riverjhelum.com

Rupalee Exclusifs,
Wyncote, PA,
215/576-7188, www.rupalee.com •

Rwanda Basket Company,
888/ 893-9914,
Bellevue, WA, www.rwandabaskets.com

Sanyork,
Denver, CO,
800/754-2583,
www.sanyorkfairtrade.com •

SERRV International,
Madison, WI,
800/422-5915,
www.serrv.org

Shanti Boutique,
Helena, MT,
415/354-0798, www.shantiboutique.com

Shiana LLC,
Bangkok, Thailand,
www.shiana.com

Siempre Sol,
Mill Valley, CA,
916/663-9512, www.siempresol.org

Simple Peace Bags,
Corona del Mar, CA
949/720-8092,
www.simple-peace.com

Singing Shaman Traders, Newman Lake, WA
208/773-5616, www.singingshamantraders.com

Sol Fair Trade,
Seattle, WA
206/307- 1738, www.solfairtrade.com

The S.P.I.R.A.L. Foundation,
Pacific Palisades, CA,
310/459-6671,
www.spiralfoundation.org

Susan Hebert Imports, Inc., Portland, OR,
503/248-1111,
www.ecobre.com

Sustainable Threads,
North Brunswick, NJ,
732/940-7487, www.sustainablethreads.com

Sustaining Cultures,
Taos, NM
575-613-3490, www.sustainingcultures.org

Swahili, Inc.,
Eugene, OR,
541/684-0688
www.swahili-imports.com •

Taraluna,
Eureka, CA, 877/325-9129,
www.taraluna.com

Ten Thousand Villages,
Akron, PA,
877/883-8341, www.tenthousandvillages.com
(see Web site for more
than 150 store locations
in North America • •)

Terra Experience,
Madison, WI
608/231-1247, www.terraexperience.com

Unique Batik,
Raleigh, NC
919/856-0448, www.uniquebatik.us

Upavim Crafts/Mayan Hands, Ijamsville, MD,
301/515-5911, www.upavimcrafts.com

Virunga Artisans,
Orinda, CA,
925/254-0358, www.VirungaArt.com

Women of the Cloud Forest,
Pittsburgh, PA,
412/475-8580, www.womenofthecloudforest.com

Women’s Work,
Poughkeepsie, NY
845/849-1858, www.womensworkbw.com

WorldFinds,
Westmont, IL
800/609-9303, www.worldfinds.com

Yoga Nine LLC/Buddha Body Fair Trade Store,
Smithville, NJ,
609/404-0999 www.yoganine.com

Zambian Soap Company, Boulder, CO,
720/323-5975, www.zambiansoap.com

Fair Trade is a system of exchange that honors producers, communities, consumers, and the environment. It is a model for the global economy rooted in people-to-people connections, justice, and sustainability. Businesses such as Equal Exchange and Ten Thousand Villages pioneered this model of connecting consumers to producers and supporting worker-owned co-ops. They are the leaders of Fair Trade, and many of them are members of Green America's Green Business Network.

When you make Fair Trade purchases you are supporting:

A Fair Price for Products

The rise in interest in Fair Trade led to the development of Fair Trade certification. Certifications like Fairtrade America and Fair Trade USA (formerly known as TransFair USA) certify parts of a company's supply chain/product line to ensure that minimum standards related to labor, sustainability, and more are met. Fair Trade prohibits forced labor, child labor, and discrimination, and protects freedom of association and collective bargaining rights. If child labor should surface, remediation guidelines are in place. Certified farmers are guaranteed a Fair Trade floor price for their cocoa beans as well as a social premium. Individual farmers In order to use the Fair Trade label, 100% of the primary ingredient must be certified. Although a helpful tool for responsible shoppers, it is important to note that certification alone is not enough to solve all fair labor issues within a supply chain.

Fair Trade Invests in People and Communities

Many Fair Trade producer cooperatives and artisan collectives reinvest their revenues into strengthening their businesses and their communities. In addition, for each Fair Trade product sold the cooperative also receives a set amount of money, called the social premium, which is invested in community development projects democratically chosen by the cooperative. Examples of projects funded through Fair Trade include the building of health care clinics and schools, starting scholarship funds, building housing and providing leadership training and women's empowerment programs.

Environmental Sustainability

Fair Trade farmers and artisans respect the natural habitat and are encouraged to engage in sustainable production methods. Farmers implement integrated crop management and avoid the use of toxic agrochemicals for pest management. Nearly 85% of Fair Trade Certified™ coffee is also organic.
Learn more about Fair Trade's environmental standards »

Fair Labor is Economic Empowerment for Small Scale Producers

Fair Trade supports small scale producers, those at the bottom of the economic ladder or from marginalized communities, that otherwise do not have access to economic mobility. Fair Trade encourages and supports the cooperative system where each producer owns a portion of the business, has equal say in decisions and enjoys equal returns from the market.

Direct Trade

Importers following the Fair Trade model try to purchase from Fair Trade cooperatives as directly as possible, eliminating unnecessary middlemen and empowering farmers to develop the business capacity necessary to compete in the global marketplace. Ideally, the certification also secures long-term, stable relationships between producers and importers; however, as Fair Trade certifications expand to include larger companies, some supply chains contain more steps than as described in the ideal chart (above).

Recently, Direct Trade companies have started becoming an alternative to Fair Trade certification, primarily within the artisinal coffee and chocolate markets. These smaller businesses work directly with farmers and cooperatives to source their ingredients. Due to their relatively recent entry into the American market, there isn't a Direct Trade certification body.

Fair Labor Conditions

Workers are guaranteed freedom of association and safe working conditions. Fair Trade also encourages women's participation in and leadership of cooperatives. Human rights and child labor laws are strictly enforced.

Learn about Fair Trade products and the farmers that produce them »

Promote Fair Trade in your community!

In the U.S., about 80% of consumed sugar is produced domestically. However, what is imported often comes from impoverished sugarcane farmers in the global south. Fair Trade Certified™ sugar protects sugarcane farmers against the volatile world marketplace, hazardous working conditions, and environmental degredation.

Fair Trade Sugar Cooperative

ACOZC

Paraguay

photo and profile provided by TransFair USA

La Asociación de Cañicultores Organicos de la Zona Central (ACOZC ) is a 60 member co-operative formed in 2002 by sugarcane farmers of Guarambare, Paraguay. The farmers cultivate about 10,000 tons of sugar cane per year on their 8-10 hectare plots, and a local sugar processor transforms the cane into about 600 tons of raw sugar. The small-scale, family farmers favor traditional techniques, cultivating 100% organic sugar.

Since their Certification in 2004, Fair Trade has provided for:

• Productive Investment: The co-op provides free technical assistance and organic certification services to its members. Television programs tailored to quality improvements are broadcast throughout the community on Visión Rural por Telefuturo.
• Credit Program: ACOZC provides low-interest loans to members.
• Health: ACOZC created a social security medical program, which provides healthcare to members at a reduced cost.

More about sugar:

• Large amounts of herbicides and pesticides are commonly sprayed on to sugar cane crops. Burning and processing of sugar crops can also cause serious pollution of the ground, waterways, and the air.
• On Fair Trade farms, producers must adhere to strict standards regarding the use and handling of pesticides, the protection of natural waters, virgin forest, and other ecosystems of high ecological value, and the management of erosion and waste, according to TransFair USA.
• Following the success of Fair Trade Certified™ sugar in Europe, the sugar became available in the U.S. in March of 2005

As word spreads about the dangerous chemicals used in electronics manufacturing, we have been getting asked “well, what phone should I buy then?” (Would you prefer to view this graphic as a PDF? Click here to open)

For smartphones and other electronics, the best way to ensure your next phone does not contribute to worker abuse is to buy a used or refurbished phone. Before you make the choice to buy though, you may try to fix the phone you have (if broken) or simply pledge not to upgrade needlessly. Phone manufacturers and service providers like to encourage customers to upgrade their devices at least every year, but phones can in fact work for much longer.

FIX:
iFixit is also a great resource to learn how to repair your electronics and order needed parts.

BUY USED:
There are many vendors out there for used or factory refurbished phones, which help to divert phones from ending up in landfills.

RECYCLE:
If and when your phone does stop working, recycle it with an e-Stewards recycler.

e-Stewards recyclers are certified monitored by the nonprofit Basel Action Network to ensure that they recycle e-waste responsibly and do not ship it overseas where workers in scrapyards are exposed to dangerous work with without protection.

Green Americans know that when we make purchases we are voting with our dollars, and we want to know that our spending does not finance unsafe working conditions or unfair treatment. By pledging to fix your phone, not upgrading, or buying a new phone, you are helping to curb the ever-growing demand for new, exploitative phones.

Do you have any other tips for choosing electronics responsibly?

Cocoa is a $16 billion a year industry, but the average annual revenue the cocoa farmers receives is between $30 and $110 per household. The Fair Trade certification for chocolate has given over 42,000 cocoa farmers in West Africa, the Caribbean, and the Americas a decent price for their crop. Since 90% of the world's cocoa is grown on small family farms of 12 acres or less, Fair Trade cocoa is directly improving the standard of living for cocoa farmers in the poorest regions of the world.

Fair Trade Cocoa Cooperative

Kuapa Kokoo

Ghana

Photo and profile provided
by TransFair USA

Kuapa Kokoo is a 35,000-member cocoa producer cooperative founded in Ghana in 1993. It represents a unique empowerment effort that enables small cocoa farmers to have a voice in government and attain more information regarding their dealings with cocoa buyers. Kuapa Kokoo is made up of village societies that elect committees and representatives at a regional level, who in turn elect representatives to the National Union. This Union represents farmers’ interests to government and industry bodies, and shares information that is beneficial to its members.

Kuapa Kokoo owns 33% of the Day Chocolate Company that in turn sells Fair Trade Certified™ Divine and Dubble chocolates in the UK and US. This unique venture allows Kuapa Kokoo’s members to increase their profits from their cocoa and enhance their knowledge of the western chocolate market.

“A bite of Fair Trade chocolate means a lot to peasant farmers in the south. It opens the doors to development and gives children access to healthcare, education, and a decent standard of living.” —Mr. Ohemeng-Tinyase, Managing Director of Kuapa Kokoo

More about chocolate:

• West African countries are dependent on cocoa. The six largest cocoa producing countries are the Ivory Coast, Ghana, Indonesia, Nigeria, Brazil, and Cameroon. In Ghana, cocoa accounts for 40% of total export revenues, and two million farmers are employed in cocoa production. The Ivory Coast supplies 43% of the world's cocoa, according to Global Exchange.
• In many families, the children work on farms with their family members. In the Ivory Coast, 66% of cocoa farmers have never attended school.
• Trafficked child labor and child slave labor are also problematic in this industry. According to a USAID and International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) study in 2002, "an estimated 284,000 children are working in cocoa farms on hazardous tasks such as using machetes and applying pesticides and insecticides without the necessary protective equipment. Many of these children work on family farms...but about 12,500 children working on cocoa farms had no relatives in the area, a warning sign for trafficking".
• Many Fair Trade producer cooperatives use their Fair Trade premiums to invest in community projects such as construction of schools and health clinics, as well providing organic agriculture training.
• Over 50,000 cocoa growers in eleven countries are members of Fair Trade cooperatives. Fair Trade cocoa is grown in Belize, Bolivia, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Ghana, Haiti, Cote D’Ivoire, Nicaragua, and Peru.

The Cocoa Barometer is a biennial report on the current state of sustainability in the cocoa farming industry.  In 2015, the report found that West African cocoa farmers were living well below the global poverty level of $2/day; chocolate company mergers are increasingly consolidating most of the power to just a handful of chocolate companies; and younger farmers are less interested in cocoa farming, leading to an increase in the average age of cocoa farmer. Since the publication of the 2015 report, much has changed in the cocoa industry.

In 2015, Tulane University, under contract with the US Department of Labor, published a report revealing that the number of children working in cocoa fields increased over the 15+ years companies, governments, and activists have been working on this issue. Then, beginning in 2016, farmers were hit with record low cocoa prices as well as an oversupply of cocoa in the market. However, since there is little transparency or accountability in the industry, it is unclear what the true size and scope of the problems are, and how effective current approaches to addressing farming income and child labor are.

In light of these updates, the 2018 Cocoa Barometer notes that continuing with ‘business as usual’ is nowhere near sufficient to address all of the pressing problems that face farmers and the industry.

Some key points from the 2018 Cocoa Barometer include:

• Scale of problem is larger than solutions: Although chocolate companies and producing governments have been working together to try to address sustainability in cocoa supply chains, their efforts have not matched the size of the problem. Most sustainability programs only effect a small percentage of cocoa farmers, and due to a lack of publicly available information, it’s unclear how much of an impact these programs have made. Meanwhile, certification, although a helpful tool for both companies and consumers, has not reached as many cocoa farmers in West Africa as industry and activists once hoped it would, and on its own cannot solve the underlying structural issues related to poverty that farmers face.
• Low cocoa prices and a need for living income: The price of cocoa dropped significantly in 2016, from above $3,000 to below $1,900 in a matter of months, and has not fully recovered. Due to low cocoa prices, companies are saving billions of dollars in purchasing costs; meanwhile, farmers are hit hard by low market prices. Cocoa farmers were already living below the poverty line before the crash, and the fall in income makes clear that more needs to be done to ensure that cocoa farmers can earn a living income from their work.
• Large scale deforestation: Over the past year, deforestation has been a hot-button topic in the cocoa industry. Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana have lost most of their primary forest areas to legal and illegal deforestation. At this point, more than ninety percent of West Africa’s original forests are gone.  An estimated 30-40% of cocoa from Cote d’Ivoire comes from illegal plantations in deforested areas. In 2017, the global cocoa sector announced the Cocoa and Forests Initiative, a multi-stakeholder commitment to combat deforestation in Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana. Although this is a promising first step, it is crucial that the non-deforestation commitments are expanded to other cocoa producing regions as well.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND NEXT STEPS

Although some progress has been made in the cocoa sector, overall, the entire industry still has much to do to achieve companies’ stated sustainability goals and support farmers. Some recommendations from the Cocoa Barometer include:

• Implementing prices that provide farmers a living income;
• Prioritizing elimination of structural poverty as a sustainability commitment;
• Expanding current deforestation commitments to a worldwide moratorium on deforestation;
• Developing and implementing transparency and accountability mechanisms in cocoa growing countries and throughout the cocoa supply chain.

It’s clear that current sustainability efforts will not fix the problems plaguing the cocoa industry. Companies and governments need to reevaluate their current programs and commitments, and approach new solutions with an increased sense of urgency and ambition. While some of the major companies have announced investments in new sustainability programs, others still lag behind in sharing what their plans are.  One of the biggest laggards in the industry is Godiva.

The cocoa industry is at a crucial turning point right now. Join us in asking Godiva to not only step up their commitments to meet their competitors’, but to become a leader on this issue – take action today!

Read the full Cocoa Barometer here.

The Cocoa Barometer is published by the VOICE Network, an international consortium of NGOs that work in the cocoa sphere. Green America, International Labor Rights Forum, and Oxfam America are American members of the VOICE Network.

Summertime would not be the same without picnics, potlucks, and cookouts. Some would say it would not be the same without the common dishes we all whip up to bring to these events, such as potato salad, coleslaw, and deviled eggs. All of these dishes have something in common: mayonnaise*. Health-conscious people avoid it and few people admit to using it, but it is everywhere. Made mostly of oil, eggs, and vinegar, not only is it used as a dressing, some people even mix it with ketchup and put it on hot dogs and burgers, or use it alone on French fries.

It is likely that either Hellmann’s Real Mayonnaise, which holds 31 percent market share in the US (and 52% in Canada), or its close competitor Kraft Miracle Whip will likely be the brand in your potato salad. Other similar culprits may include Duke’s, Best Foods, Kraft Real Mayonnaise, and Heinz. We recently reported that Hellmann’s launched a mayo option made without genetically engineered (referred to as GE or GMO) ingredients. We are now asking Kraft to go above and beyond this commitment by removing GMO ingredients from Miracle Whip, as well as the GMOs in the animal feed that produce the egg ingredient.

Miracle Whip was introduced as a cheaper alternative to Hellmann’s during the Great Depression. The main difference between the two products at the time is that Miracle Whip used powdered instead of whole eggs; therefore, it was designated a salad dressing rather than mayo due to a technical definition that “real” mayo could only contain whole eggs, vinegar, and olive oil. The rivalry between the two products is staunchly still evident; you are either a Miracle Whip person, or a mayo one, and likely Hellmann’s (known as Best Foods in some parts of the country). Despite Hellmann’s best efforts, Miracle Whip soared in popularity and remains a direct competitor today.

What is the Problem with Miracle Whip?

While Miracle Whip originally used powdered instead of whole eggs, the ingredients used in the original product were far simpler than today. Now, the product is made with less-than wholesome ingredients produced in ways that put people, animals, pollinators, and the planet at risk. Half of the ingredients are likely produced from GE crops. The eggs are also sourced from concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), commonly referred to as factory farms.

The actual list of ingredients in Kraft Miracle Whip are (those that are likely directly or indirectly GMOs are in bold): water, soybean oil, water, high fructose corn syrup, vinegar, modified cornstarch, eggs, salt, natural flavor, mustard flour, potassium sorbate as a preservative, paprika, spice, dried garlic.

Greenwashing Alert: Before Kraft replies claiming it is making more natural products as well, we would like to alert readers to one of its product lines created to appeal to consumers seeking better food made with better ingredients: Pure Kraft Mayo. The company said an original recipe inspired it. The first ingredient listed is soybean oil, which is most likely GMO. The ingredients also include sugar, which is most likely from GMO sugar beets. Other ingredients that are likely directly or indirectly GMOs are vinegar and eggs. Sorry, Kraft, but we are not falling for this greenwashing marketing technique.

Concerns about GMOs in Miracle Whip

GMOs and growing herbicide resistance have increased the use of toxic chemicals on crops, polluting our soil and water and posing a significant negative environmental impact. Corporate control ofGMOs hurts small farmers. The biotech and chemical corporations spend millions to support anti-labeling efforts and keep consumers in the dark about their food. There are also health risks. GMOs are not yet proven safe for human health—the FDA does not require independent testing of GE foods, allowing for many of the studies on GMOs to be industry-funded and heavily biased. Among the list of ingredients in Kraft Miracle Whip, the following products are of particular concern:

• Soybean oil: 93 percent of soy in the US is GMO
• High Fructose Corn Syrup: Made from corn, of which 89 percent is GMO
• Vinegar: Also made from corn
• Eggs: Laying hens (egg-producing chickens) are fed GMO corn and soy
• Natural flavors: A nebulous term that includes many ingredients that people don’t consider to be natural

Additional Resources GMO Inside released an updated mayonnaise scorecard showing how various major brands measure up in terms of GMO ingredients, prevalence of eggs from CAFOs, and sustainability. Within the scorecard you will find better alternatives and highlight which brands to avoid. We also posted recipes for making homemade mayonnaise to give consumers the ultimate ability to control the quality of ingredients used to make the ever-present spread.

Read Part 2 of this series here.

*For our purposes, the term mayonnaise includes mayonnaise and mayonnaise-like products known as salad dressings that contain either whole or powdered eggs.

You may be asking, “Why Starbucks?” when you see GMO Inside's “What the Starbucks: From Crop to Cup” infographic covering the impact of sourcing industrial conventional milk.

Why focus on one company and the milk it is using when there are so many pressing environmental issues going on in our country and around the world, like the drought in California? It is estimated that CA’s wells only have 1 year’s supply of water and that the snowpack the state depends on is only 8 percent of what it should be. These are concerning facts considering that CA produces 50 percent of the nation’s fruits and veggies, including 90 percent of the grapes, broccoli, almonds, and walnuts. Yet Starbucks milk is more connected to the CA drought than it appears.

Considering CA’s drought, dairy production is one of the most pressing issues, yet it receives very little attention. California is the top dairy producer in the nation, with nearly 1.78 million dairy cows. The USDA calculates that dairy farms require 150 gallons of water per cow per day. Industrialized dairy cows are fed a diet of GE crops made up of corn, soy, alfalfa, and cotton. Alfalfa is California’s most water-intensive crop; none of that production goes directly to human consumption.

Overall our goal is to open up the conversation to discuss the deeper issues within the dairy supply chain: animal welfare, pollinator health, antibiotic overuse, and the environmental and health impacts of CAFOs. Starbucks milk provides us with an excellent lens and connecting point to do so. Dairy and meat are large contributors to environmental problems but there are so many deeper issues that need to be discussed. This campaign creates a meeting point to discuss them all in connection to one another since they are ultimately all interconnected. In order to create a more sustainable food system it is important that we address all of the impacts of dairy and other forms of industrialized agriculture.

We call on Starbucks specifically because it is one of the largest purchasers of milk in the US, purchasing over 140 million gallons of milk each year. This volume of milk is expected to grow as the company plans to add 1 store every 6 hours over the next five years. It is a powerful company and has the ability to create systemic change by guaranteeing contracts for farmers, a necessary incentive to move beyond the industrialized system toward more organic and sustainable practices. Starbucks is also a visible company that cares much about its public perception and being seen as an agent of good. Read more about our specific Starbucks plan for change and reasoning.

So yes, while the campaign is targeted at Starbucks, it really is about so much more. To learn more about the industrial convention milk supply chain read the full report that accompanies the infographic.

In 1986 the Reagan administration determined, through the Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology, that it was not necessary to create any new laws for the regulation of biotechnology as these new products did not pose any risk. Yet, the first GE crop, the Flavr Savr tomato, wasn’t approved for cultivation until 1996. The current laws that regulate GE crops and pesticides were established before we could understand the true impact of this technology. This decision set the precedent that GE crops were substantially equivalent to its non-GE counterparts; this bases regulation on the product, not on the process. Substantial equivalence determined that GMO crops are virtually the same as its non-GMO counterparts and therefore pose no substantial risk and should not be treated or regulated differently.

Who is responsible for biotech regulation?

The responsibility of regulating GE crops lies within three different federal agencies; the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The FDA is responsible for determining whether or not GE food is safe to consume and does such under the authority granted by the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act(FFDCA). Part of this determination allowed for products to be deemed generally recognized as safe (GRAS). Dating back to 1958, GRAS “is a legal term describing certain food ingredients that are safe enough to enter the market without prior government approval or restrictions.” The GRAS process established streamlined decision making, allowing manufacturers to get their products to market faster and with minimal (if any) oversight.

Who determines GRAS status?

GRAS determination is not made by any federal agency, rather it falls under the decision making of the manufacturer that created the ingredient or product, a blatant conflict of interest. A company determines for itself whether it meets the GRAS standards. With GRAS status, an item requires no prior FDA approval before going to market. Companies can voluntarily submit their GRAS determination for review by the FDA, but are not required. In reviewing GRAS determination, the FDA does not perform any independent research or testing, relying solely on information provided by the company and handpicked relevant published studies. The FDA allows companies to market and use chemicals while under review. The report, Generally Recognized as Secret published by NRDC, found that a shocking number of chemicals had been deemed GRAS and did not participate in the voluntary review process, leaving the FDA with no information or review of the chemicals in question.

In all, the FDA does not determine the safety of new food ingredients and products. GRAS status, which holds that a product has the same structure, function, and composition of food already on the market, is self-determined by biotech companies without consideration for the impacts of its corresponding pesticides.

What else falls under GRAS?

GMOs are not the only GRAS items that are controversial; sweeteners, MSG, and caffeine are all products that were deemed GRAS without consideration for the levels at which they are consumed. These items have infiltrated grocery store shelves leaving consumers with a steady stream of them without true consideration for potential long-term health impacts. Further concern over these regulations is that they contain extremely vague language using words that have no legal definition and can be broadly interpreted, such as qualified experts and adequately safe.

The GRAS process and the hastened approval of a number of new more harmful, GE crops and pesticides raises major concerns and fails to instill much faith in the existing safety regulatory framework. There is a reason teachers don’t let children grade their own exams; so why is the FDA allowing Big Ag and biotech companies to grade themselves, especially when it is at the risk of citizens everywhere?

Feeding The World Without GMOs from Gringo Starr Productions on Vimeo.

One of the most often touted benefits of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or genetically engineered (GE) crops, is that they are essential to feed the world’s growing population. There are currently over 7.5 billion people on this planet and expected to rise to 9.5 billion by 2050. If consumption trends continue, in order to feed that many people, we would need to grow one-third more food. First, let's look at this argument from an agricultural perspective.

The vast majority of GMO crop production does not go towards direct food consumption; rather, it is used for the production of animal feed and ethanol. These are crops engineered to withstand, work in partnership with, and self-generate pesticides. They are not engineered to increase yield or face climate-related challenges to growth, such as drought tolerance. There is one variety of corn has been bred for drought resistance, but it is likely to only be effective in 15 percent of US corn fields and is not effective in severe or extreme drought, which we are expected to have more of in the coming years.

Industrial agriculture isn't the answer. 

Increases in yield from GE crops are a result of a decrease in yield lost to pests from Bt crops, pesticides, and an increase in fertilizer use (made from petroleum, defeating the purpose of ethanol). Unfortunately, growing weed and pest resistance is already decreasing their effectiveness, requiring much more dangerous pesticides and making useless one of the most used organic pesticides, Bt. These minimal increases in yield have come with major externalities, including but not limited to water pollution, pollinator loss, and soil degradation, that put future food security at risk. After decades of attempts, Big Biotech has not been successful in breeding GE seeds that increase yield or reduce water use. Conventional breeding outperforms genetic engineering when it comes to nitrogen use efficiency (the ability for crops to pull nitrogen out of soil, developing a more efficient use of fertilizer, ultimately decreasing the demand for fertilizers) and water use efficiency (WUE).

Overall, conventional breeding is responsible for most of the successful advances in yield. It also happens on a much shorter timeline at a much lower cost. Industry studies show that it takes a minimum of ten years to develop a GE crop and nearly $150 million; whereas conventional crops take only $1 million to develop, improvements WUE and drought resistance naturally occur at an estimated 1 percent each year. While Big Biotech develop GMOs in a lab, farmers are improving traditional crops in the field. Due to this drag rate by the time GE crops are finally released they are actually behind their conventional counterparts.

Conventional crops could also be more effectively bred to work in partnership with the cultural food needs and geographical climate and soil challenges unique to specific regions. Forcing GE crops into developing countries with higher existing biodiversity puts that biodiversity and future food supplies at risk by threatening native species and practices. There are an abundance of types of crop varieties (both already in use and wild) accessible to breeders and growers. It is important that we tap into this vast resource to expand nutrient diversity and accessibility.

The Alternative to GMOs: Agroecology 

Considering the changing climate and increasing pressures on and demand for our scarce resources, expanding the industrialized system of agricultural is not the answer. Agriculture is already one of the largest contributors to climate change. In order to sustainability produce the food we will need, we must support a transition to more regenerative, agroecological methods of farming. Agroecology as a “science is the ‘application of ecological science to the study, design, and management of sustainable agroecosystems.’ As a set of agricultural practices, agroecology seeks ways to enhance agricultural systems by mimicking natural processes, thus creating beneficial biological interactions and synergies among the components of the agroecosystem.”

It is essential to look at the entire system and how plants work with one another and their surrounding climates. Regenerative agriculture works to rebuild soil health and biodiversity; sequestering carbon, preventing soil erosion, protecting water sources, and reducing harmful pesticide and fertilizer runoff in the process. Agroecology is also a much better system of management for small holders and provides a more balanced diet with more nutrient dense crops. Smallholders already produce 70 percent of the world’s food on only 25 percent of the land. More diversified planting is better for soil health and biodiversity and will better handle the challenges presented by climate change and the damage we have already done to our resources.

Lack of Equity + Poverty = Hunger 

Hunger is not an issue of agriculture or food quantity, but one of poverty and equity. There is currently enough food in the world to feed 10 billion people. That means that we actually have an excess of food.

Despite that, there is still a shocking number of people who are hungry, 791 million (the majority of which live in developing nations). More than anything, hunger is a result of poverty. The World Bank estimates that there are over 1 billion poor people in developing countries. Continued hunger leads to continued poverty as those suffering from chronic hunger are unable to perform manual labor (the most common source of income in developing countries) and increase their standard of living. Much of this poverty and hunger is caused by existing economic inequity as a result of current political systems that favor those with higher incomes. The current industrial food system emphasizes the need for countries (regardless of size) to export food crops despite the local demand for basic nutrients. If poverty and livelihoods are not improved it will not matter how much food is produced if the poorest, and in turn hungriest, do not have the financial ability to access it.

At the same time that there is great hunger there is also excessive food waste throughout the world. It is even worse in the western hemisphere; the US alone wastes 40 percent of its food. In western countries, grocery stores throw out a lot of food and will not purchase unattractive produce. Food is wasted simply because it is visually unappealing or goes uneaten. In developing nations food waste is a result of a lack of infrastructure, capital investment, and basic necessities. Lack of access to road ways, storage facilities, and basic refrigeration prevents food access and increases spoilage rates. With proper investment and support these problems could be remedied.

Despite the hunger epidemic we also have an obesity epidemic as a result of poor nutrition, high meat consumption, and increased processed food consumption. Worldwide, most of the expected demand for an increase in food is not based on a baseline need for nutrients, but rather the growing trend of developing countries to adopt the western diet of meat consumption. It takes substantially more calories to produce meat and ultimately results in a number of health challenges. Not only does this require a higher production of animal feed crops, the raising of animals for meat puts a number of stresses on the environment due to the current system of large concentrated and confined animal feeding operations, or CAFOs.

Hunger is an issue of politics and justice.

It is a choice that we make as a nation and as group of developed countries. In order to tackle these problems of access we need to drastically change our food system. We need an international system of agriculture that supports food sovereignty, regenerative agroecological farming practices, and food security on a regional and local level. GMOs are not the answer.

If GMOs are not feeding the world, then what do we do to decrease worldwide hunger? Find out here. 

We all know that climate change is driven by our energy and transportation systems, but we don’t hear as much about how our current food systems also create climate change. However, sustainable agriculture and food systems could be a huge part of the solution instead.

The Problem: Fossil Fuels & Soil Degradation

Currently, modern industrial agriculture uses enormous amounts of fossil fuels – particularly for fertilizers – and degrades the soil so that it doesn’t retain carbon. Energy consumed during fertilizer manufacture was equivalent to 191 billion liters [50.5 billion gallons] of diesel in 2000 and is projected to rise to 277 billion [73.2 billion gallons] in 2030. All of this energy is being used to produce an input that is richer and more nutrient dense when produced naturally, without carbon emissions.

The Solution: Organic Agriculture & Sustainable Practices

There’s a better way to practice agriculture – one that nourishes the soil and sequesters carbon. Modern organic agriculture, which produces yields similar to conventional agriculture, has the potential to sequester enormous amounts of carbon. Organic, sustainable agriculture takes carbon from the atmosphere and puts it back in the soil. The microorganisms in healthy soil convert organic waste into humus, which stores carbon rather than releasing it. These microorganisms also store carbon themselves, because they consume plant sugars, which are made with carbon through photosynthesis.

If 10,000 medium-sized US farms converted to organic farming, the emissions reduction would be equivalent to removing over 1 million cars from the road. If all US croplands became organic, it would increase soil carbon storage by 367 million tons and would cut nitrogen oxide emissions dramatically.

In fact, research from the Rodale Institute demonstrates that if we practiced organic agriculture globally, we would be able to reverse climate change. Rodale Institute created a model of a global carbon sink around the world through a 100 percent transition to organic agriculture. They compared that to the emissions that we had in 2012 globally and found that the world would have been able to sequester 111 percent of 2012 emissions. That’s how powerful organic agriculture could be as a climate change solution, and just one of the reasons we need to move to organic farming as quickly as possible.

To combat the long lasting environmental impacts of industrial agriculture, we need to farm in a way that preserves soil health, removes toxins, and protects the health of farm workers, farmers, and consumers.

Agriculture is the most polluting industry in the world because of the prevalent use of chemical pesticides and herbicides. Overtime, these toxic chemicals not only degrade soil health, but also pollute water supplies and harm the health of surrounding communities. In addition, a majority of US crops are genetically engineered.

Organic farming, and regenerative agriculture in particular, are holistic approaches which do not use chemicals. This approach improves soil health, does not cause toxic run-off, and protects farmworker health.

What Does the Organic Label Mean?

The USDA organic standard is maintained by the government and incorporates policies for maintaining soil fertility and crop nutrient levels, limiting pesticide and fertilizer usage, and preventing overall negative impacts on surrounding environments. Choosing products with the USDA organic label is a trustworthy way to avoid GMOs.

Key Practices of USDA Certified Organic:

• Prohibits use of most chemical/synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.
• Prohibits antibiotic and synthetic hormone use.
• Prohibits GMOs in all aspects of farming and processing.

Family Farms: An Invaluable Part of a Sustainable Agricultural System

Family farmers are farms, often small-scale, that take a holistic approach with concern for the broader and long-term impacts that agriculture has on the environment and community. The current generation of farmers works to ensure the sustainability of natural resources and livelihoods for future generations and surrounding communities.

However, many small-scale and family farms have been squeezed out of business by the consolidated power of corporate agribusiness and a shift to “factory farm” production.

In 2014, Green America began expanding our collaboration with farmers, gardeners, and growers across the US. We are committed to celebrating our nation’s food producers. We work to amplify the voice of the farming community and bridge the gap of communication between farmers, consumers, and policy makers.

Thank you to all those growing our food. We appreciate you

Genetically engineered (GE) crops [more commonly referred to as genetically modified organisms (GMOs)] are crops that have been engineered to produce certain qualities not intrinsic to the plant itself. An organism is inserted with genetic material from a different species to create a new organism not developed in nature or through traditional breeding.

The most common GE crops are developed to be resistant to an herbicide, such as glyphosate, 2,4-D, and/or dicamaba, and engineered with the pesticide Bt to protect against pests (the plant itself produces the Bt toxin).

Concerns with GE Crops: Health, Regulation, and Environment

• Lack of Proper Regulation: Uncertainty of the safety of GE crops due to the lax regulation by the FDA, USDA, and EPA and the lack of unbiased scientific research on the long-term human and environmental health impacts. Several studies conducted by scientists have called into question the safety of consuming GE crops. Further unbiased research regarding health and safety issues is needed.
   
• Destruction of Ecosystems: Majority of GE crops are engineered to work in partnership with a specific herbicide, most commonly glyphosate. Since the crops themselves are engineered to resist the effects of the herbicides, the chemicals are sprayed freely and extensively on the farm negatively impacting surrounding communities and ecosystems.
   
• Eradication of Key Pollinators: Increased use of pesticides has led to a decline in key pollinator species, such as honeybees and monarch butterflies.
   
• Development of Superweeds & Pests: Excessive use of pesticides and herbicides in connection with GE crops has led to superweeds and pests that have developed resistance to the most commonly used pesticides. As a result, farmers and chemical companies are turning to much more toxic pesticides including 2,4-D and diacamba.
   
• Community Health Impact: Both glyphosate and 2,4-D—herbicides used extensively on GE crops—have been deemed probable carcinogens by the World Health Organization and have a major impact on the health of surrounding communities.
   
• Soil Degradation: GE crops encourage mono-cropping, where one large area is grown with the same crop variety year after year. This method of agriculture damages soil health and fertility and quickly depletes nutrients. Poor soil health requires farmers to rely on external inputs such as nitrogen fertilizers produced from fossil fuels. The overuse of nitrogen fertilizers is not only continuing our dependence on oil and perpetuating climate change, but it is also polluting our water ways and creating dead zones void of aquatic life.

GE crops are not part of a sustainable system of agriculture. In order to sustain our soil and food supply, we must move to a regenerative system of agriculture, with its basis in the principles of organics. This means moving away from destructive chemical inputs such as pesticides and synthetic fertilizers and moving towards systems that work in tune with the natural biology of soil and the environment. We actively engage with members of Congress, federal regulating agencies, and companies to open up the dialogue on the necessary steps towards a more sustainable food landscape. We are committed to educating consumers, like you, around the impacts of GE crops and industrial agriculture and the steps that we can all take to protect and improve our food and the environment.

What To Look For

Look for these seals to ensure that the food you're eating does not contain genetically engineered ingredients.

What To Avoid: Genetically Engineered Crops & Ingredients

These are the genetically engineered crops that are currently on the market: corn, soy, alfalfa, canola, cotton, papaya, sugar beets, zucchini and yellow summer squash.

In the US, GMOs are in as much as 80 percent of conventional processed food. The following product ingredients are likely derived GE crops: Amino Acids, Aspartame, Ascorbic Acid, Citric Acid, Dextrose, Flavorings (“natural” and “artificial”), High-Fructose Corn Syrup, Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein, Lactic Acid, Maltodextrins, Molasses, Monosodium Glutamate, Sodium Ascorbate, Sodium Citrate, Sucrose, Textured Vegetable Protein (TVP), Xanthan Gum, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Yeast Products, and many more.

Green America's GMO Inside campaign is working to get GMOs and toxins out of our food. We've had a number of recent victories including Campbell’s offering Goldfish and soups with organic ingredients, Hershey removing GE sugar from its Kisses and chocolate bars, Hellmann’s launching a non-GMO mayo, and Similac introducing three non-GMO baby formulas.

Despite a love of football, Suzan Shown Harjo has attended exactly one of her home team’s NFL games, back in 1974. The team was the Washington Redsk--s. [Editor’s note: Green America has made it our policy not to print this racial slur in its entirety. From here on, we will use the term “R-word.”]

Harjo—a poet, writer, lecturer, and policy advocate who has helped Native Peoples protect sacred places and recover more than one million acres of land—recalls one fan who was seated behind her and her husband saying of the couple, “I think they’re [R-words].”

She gently replied, “No, I’m Cheyenne and Muscogee, and he’s Muscogee.”

But the odd fan behavior continued. The couple heard people whispering behind them to “look at the [R-words]” or “look at the Indians,” and some even started petting their long hair, asking others to “look at this [R-word] hair.”

The game hadn’t even started.

“We had to get up and leave,” she says. “That is the real effect of objectification—where you take away a person’s humanity and are just touching them in inappropriate ways.”

As part of building a socially just economy, Green America joins Harjo and other tribal activists in calling for an end to the use of all stereotyped mascots and team names—starting with the R-word as the worst example. Whether you’re a sports fan or not, you can use your economic power as a potential purchaser of sports tickets and team logowear—as well as a customer or shareholder of corporate team sponsors—to discourage the use of racial slurs and caricatures.

A Slur with Tragic Origins

While some sports fans dismiss concern over use of the R-word as a case of political correctness going too far, the vast majority of Native Americans feel this word is tremendously painful, given its tragic history, the fact that it is a dictionary-defined “racial slur,” and the manner in which it ignores their cultural heritage and contributions.

Washington football team owner Dan Snyder has maintained that the R-word name is a point of honor that celebrates William “Lone Star” Dietz, the team’s first coach, whom they claim was Sioux.

They are mistaken, says Harjo. FBI documents show that Dietz was a German-American who stole the name of James One Star, an actual Sioux man, hoping to both avoid being drafted into WWI and to cash in on famed athlete Jim Thorpe’s fan base. He even went so far as to write letters to One Star’s sister pretending to be James, as she testified at Dietz’s draft-evasion trial.

But even if you ignore the Dietz connection, the R-word itself has truly shocking origins. Harjo says that even near the turn of the 20th century, bounty hunters traversed the country killing Native Americans and bringing in “their bloody red skins,” or scalps, as proof. And while Western films would lead us to think that “scalp” solely means the skin on the top of one’s head, Harjo says it was also often the genitalia.

“They were paid on a sliding scale—so much for a man, so much for a woman, so much for a child,” she says. “The only way they’d know gender or age was from the genitalia.”

And so, the people who were being killed became known by a word that their murderers saw as descriptive of their sole value—one describing the skins that they could rip away and sell.

“This is the worst word that we can be called in the English language,” she says. “This is the N-word for us.”

The Effects on Native Youth

While the R-word may be the worst example, all Indigenous stereotypes used as team names or mascots—from the Cleveland Indians to the Seminole High School Chieftains—contribute to an epidemic of depersonalizing and reductive behavior that many say is especially harmful to Native youth.

Photo by Vincent Schilling @VincentSchilling
Dahkota Brown was elected a 2013 Champion for Change by the Center for Native American Youth for his work with Native students.

A new report from the Center for American Progress (CAP) found that “these team names and mascots can establish an unwelcome and hostile learning environment for [American Indian/Alaska Native] AI/AN students.” The report also says these mascots “directly [result] in lower self-esteem and mental health” for these young people. And, says the report, studies show that these mascots “undermine the educational experience of all students, particularly those with little or no contact with indigenous and AI/AN people.”

The American Psychological Association concurs, calling for “the immediate retirement” of these team names and mascots in 2005 for all of the reasons stated in the CAP study.

Dahkota Franklin Kicking Bear Brown, a 15-year-old Wilton Miwok, knows these reasons firsthand. He says that while growing up, he always dreaded the days when his school plays their arch-rival—the Calaveras [R-words].

Brown describes the Calaveras sideline routines as featuring “a war-bonnet clad warrior on top of the announcer booth who does the stereotypical Indian drumbeat after every touchdown, fans throwing tomahawk chops,” and “cheerleaders in skimpy outfits resembling traditional buckskin outfits.”

Worst of all, he said in a speech for the Center for American Progress that went viral online this spring, “By having a racial slur of a name, Calaveras has granted all schools that they go against the right to mock and make fun of Native Americans. ... I’ve heard my friends yell ‘Kill the [R-words]!’ or ‘Send them on the Trail of Tears!’”

While some have argued that using a team name like the Chiefs or the Indians is meant to “honor” Native Americans, too often schools fail to respectfully celebrate their Native students’ individual cultural heritage.

As reported by the Indian Country Today Media Network, one egregious case was that of Seminole High School in Seminole County, OK, which uses a headdress-wearing mascot to represent its Chieftains teams. Last spring, 25 senior students at the school, who were members of the Seminole, Creek, Choctaw, and Chickasaw nations, received eagle feathers from their tribal leaders to honor their impending graduation. The students tied the feathers to their graduation caps, some adding tribal beads as well—only to be ordered by the school not to wear them. (At least one student, Kaden Tiger, wore his anyway.)

“Native youth have the highest dropout rate, the lowest graduation rate, the highest suicide rate among any ethnicity,” says Brown. “I think it is tied in part to these mascots. Our teens see these images, and it gives this false sense that we’re savages. These teens lose their cultural identity and don’t feel they fit in anywhere.”

When he was just in eighth grade, moved by “friends and cousins I saw who were on the verge of dropping out,” Brown took matters into his own hands. He started a nonprofit called NERDS (Native Education Raising Dedicated Students), which provides peer-to-peer tutoring and mentoring for Native students in seven California chapters with more to come nationwide.

“A lot of what I hear from the students is that these Native mascots really do have an effect on their lives an their self-esteem,” says Brown.

A Victory in the (Trademark) Courts

The tide of public opinion does seem to be turning against the use of stereotyped Native team names and mascots. In the 1960s, the National Indian Youth Council, Native students, and supporters attempted to persuade the University of Oklahoma to retire its mascot “Little Red,” which it did in 1970. At that time, there were more than 3,000 similar mascots at K-12 and post-secondary schools. Today, there are just over 900.

One recent victory may make it more difficult for teams to profit from merchandising if their name or logo is a Native stereotype. In 1992, Harjo and others filed a request with the US Patent and Trade Office’s Trademark, Trial, and Appeal Board (TTAB), asking it to cancel the six federal trademark licenses owned by Pro Football, Inc.—the corporation headed by Dan Snyder that owns the Washington NFL team—because the R-word is “disparaging to Native Americans.”

After two separate filings (due to the first being dismissed on appeal on a technicality by a DC District Appeals Court), TTAB agreed to cancel the six trademarks in June.
Pro Football filed an appeal in August, and it may legally keep its trademarks for now. But with people like President Obama and Hillary Clinton speaking out against the name, and high-profile news sources like the Seattle Times refusing to print the R-word, it’s clear that public sentiment is shifting. If Washington changes its name, others may follow.

Beyond Political Correctness

When Green America contacted the Washington team, it sent this statement: “Thanks for your interest on this. We appreciate and respect your opinion, like everyone’s. We will consider it as we move forward.”

They and other teams with similar names will undoubtedly have to do more than consider such opinions if they hear from enough unhappy potential ticket-holders. Take action today:

• Speak out. Talk to people, write letters to the editor, and take to social media to argue for change. Harjo says that social media has given a powerful shot in the arm to the campaign against offensive mascots, unifying and amplifying the voices of concerned citizens.
• Write to NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and your favorite team’s owner. Harjo notes that all teams share in revenues generated from the R-word, so they have a right to ask the Washington team to change its name. She hopes the NFL owners will one day unite against the R-word, much as NBA owners stood against the racist remarks made last spring by Los Angeles Clippers owner Don Sterling, whom the NBA ultimately forced to sell the team.
• Call, e-mail, and boycott FedEx. The delivery company sponsors FedExField, home base for the Washington team. The Native Voice Network (NVN) recently launched a campaign demanding that FedEx revoke its sponsorship from the team and the field.
  “Anheuser-Busch and Budweiser immediately pulled their sponsorships from the L.A. Clippers” after Sterling’s racist remarks went public, says NVN’s Chrissie Castro. “And yet the corporate sponsors of the Washington team continue to stay silent."
  NVN is asking people to share the social media memes they are creating for the campaign. You can also sign a petition on NVN’s website and participate in their national call-in days to FedEx.
  As for why FedEx continues to sponsor the team, the company had this to say: “FedEx has a long-standing, binding, contractual commitment with [Pro] Football, Inc. ... Under the agreement, FedExField not only hosts the Washington [R-words] but is home to many other civic and community activities and a variety of ... events. We are proud of our sponsorship of the field and its positive impact on the community and defer questions regarding the name of the team to the franchise owner.”Unmoved by this argument, NVN is asking people to boycott using FedEx until it takes responsibility.
• Counteract spin with meaningful contributions. In an effort to stir up good publicity in Indian Country, the Washington football franchise recently launched the Original Americans Foundation to “address the urgent challenges” on US reservations. Foundation representatives offered to pay in full for a skate park for the Quechan tribe in Yuma, AZ. The offer was turned down.
  “We will not align ourselves with an organization to simply become a statistic in their fight for name acceptance in Native communities,” said tribal representative Kenrick Escalanti in a press statement. “We’re stronger than that, and we know bribe money when we see it.”
• To support real efforts to lift up tribal communities, donate to Native-run efforts like those in the box below.

A Civil Right

Harjo isn’t asking Washington football fans to boycott their team, stressing that it’s perfectly okay to “support the team and hate the name.”

And while people often ask why she doesn’t have something more important to worry about, she would like them to realize that this issue is important: Any stereotyped mascot “is a symbol, and symbols come out of attitudes, create attitudes, and lead to actions,” she says.

NVN’s Castro agrees, calling the fight against these mascots “an important civil rights issue.” She says: “We have a right not to be discriminated against. When we show up to public events, everybody should have a right to feel safe, but we don’t when we hear people saying, ‘Kill the Indians!’ [The country] can and should be doing better.”

Making the case for recycled paper

From protecting forests to curbing climate, recycled paper use is essential for sustainability. With the below reports produced by Green America and our allied organizations, we make the case for using recycled paper, including the many ways it benefits the environment. We also share how you can better your recycling practices at home and work to help the entire system.

How does using recycled paper help the environment and climate?

Recycled paper use saves resources and reduces the paper industry's impact on the planet.
Using 100% recycled copy paper instead of 100% virgin fiber paper saves:

• 100% of the trees,
• 31% of the energy,
• 53% of the water, and produces
• 39% less solid waste.
   Read more about the benefits of recycled paper from the Environmental Paper Network...

If you don't recycle your used paper and instead throw it into the trash, it goes where all trash goes -- to the landfill. The EPA cites landfills as the single largest source of methane emissions to the atmosphere, and has identified the decomposition of paper as among the most significant sources of landfill methane. A potent gas with 21 times the heat-trapping power of CO2, methane is a major contributor to global climate change.
Find the answers to all your recycled paper questions in Environmental Defense's Q&A sheet...

How can publishers make a difference?

In the United States we use enough paper in a single day to fill the 838 miles of the Library of Congress nearly FIVE times. By using recycled fiber paper, publishers can ensure that existing paper gets a longer life. By reducing your paper usage and choosing recycled paper for what you do buy, you can lessen your environmental footprint.
Esker shows more jaw-dropping comparisons to our paper use here...

Too often, publishers are told that recycled paper is not the best environmental choice for their magazines. This only makes sense if there is a scarcity of recovered paper and we are forced to allocate our limited supply to only certain paper grades, however there are millions of tons of paper that we could be collecting for reuse. Printing and writing papers have the most intensive manufacturing process of nearly all paper types. Including recycled content in magazine-grade paper has a very significant and important role in reducing environmental impacts of paper production. 
Read more in our Green in All Grades report...

We are helping universities use recycled paper for their alumni magazines in our One Million Trees campaign. We are collecting stories from universities already using better paper, including Washington State University. "Moving to 100% recycled stock was daunting at first, but we couldn't be more pleased with the outcome of our magazine on recycled paper." 
Read our interview with Washington State University Alumni Magazine on their switch...
 

How can you help?

Have you added these tips into your recycling practices? These are especially important to do if your city uses single stream (co-mingled) recycling bins.
Check these Tips for Using the Blue Bin...

When considering a new paper or wood product for purchase, the best way to help is to first think through the original R's: reduce and reuse (they come before recycle!). Make sure that you truly need this product and if you do, then look for products made with recycled content. 
Learn how to spot better paper products here...

Back to the Vote With Your Dollar Toolkit

Everyone has the power to reduce pressure placed on forests worldwide. By choosing recycled paper, you are voting with your dollars for a cleaner and healthier planet. You can look for environmentally responsible magazines and only buy recycled and FSC-certified paper for your homes and offices.

1.Recycled Content

Like many people, you might see “Recycled” on a product and assume that it’s a high quality recycled product, unfortunately most countries do not have strict rules for how much recycled content a product needs to put “recycled” on their label. This can vary anywhere between 5% all the way to 100%. Look for any indication of the percentage of recycled content on the product package, the higher the better!

2. Next Step

Post-consumer content: This means that the product has used material that was previously consumed as a product – like a newspaper or box. We consider this to be the better choice of the two, since it has completed an entire life cycle of consumption before making its way to you! 

Pre-consumer content: This means the product was made from waste produced by some type of manufacturing process. Some products are a mix of these two types of content, just make sure to check the label or review the product online.

Better Paper Pro-tip: Make sure to not be fooled by just the term ‘recyclable’. This just means that the product can be recycled, but doesn’t signal any recycled content in the product. It's better to look for actual recycled content.

3. Certification

There are a few different certifications to look for when buying a paper product. We advise on seeking out the FSC seal (Forest Stewardship Council). The FSC certified forestry products that use sustainably-harvested wood fibers. If the product you are buying has virgin (non-recycled) fibers in it, make sure it is FSC certified.

4. Bleaching

Most paper requires bleaching, and chlorine bleaching creates very toxic chemicals and is bad for the environment. Find paper that is PCF (processed chlorine free) for recycled paper or is labeled TCF (totally chlorine free) for virgin fiber products.

Back to the Vote With Your Dollar Toolkit

Yes! Magazine ·

Printing on 100% post-consumer recycled paper, Yes! Magazine has shown a strong commitment to the environment, and has a loyal following of readers who appreciate that the company reflects their sustainable values.

Dirt Rag 

This mountain biking publication has committed to using 90% recycled paper.

Modern Cat ·

This magazine, as well as Modern Dog, prints on an FSC certified stock with 30% recycled content and vegetable based inks.

Natural Health 

Since 2005, this magazine has been committed to better paper. An average issue uses 63,000 pounds of 10% post-consumer recycled paper, saving thousands of trees.

MORE LEADERS IN THE PUBLISHING INDUSTRY

• Adelphi University Magazine offers Adelphi University alumni worldwide the opportunity to read about events at the university.
• The Ark features photography and stories on Nature Conservancy of Canada's leading-edge conservation and stewardship work.
• Audubon Magazine inspires readers to conserve the natural world through explanatory journalism and vibrant photography.
• Bay Nature educates the people of the Bay Area about, and celebrates the beauty of, the surrounding natural world.
• British Columbia Teachers' Federation magazine informs the 41,000 public school teachers in British Columbia, Canada.
• Colby Magazine is the semiannual alumni publication of Colby College in Maine.
• Green American Magazine is Green America's magazine dedicated to discussing the economic benefit of environmental practice for everyday Americans.
• KIWI is dedicated to helping parents raise their children the healthiest way possible.
• Modern Dog is the lifestyle magazine for modern dogs and their companions.
• National Green Pages is the directory for products and services for people and the planet.
• National Wildlife, NWF's award-winning, full-color nature magazine.
• Natural Awakenings has been printed on recycled paper since its inception 17 years ago.
• Optimum Wellness magazine celebrates not just food, but family, friends, relationship, Spirit, and connection.
• Organic Spa Magazine is a lifestyle magazine promoting the marriage of spa and wellness with your sustainable and organic lifestyle.
• Phi Kappa Tau: The Laurel is the print magazine published each year by the Phi Kappa Tau Foundation.
• The Progressive Populist reports on issues of interest to workers, small-business owners and family farmers and ranchers.
• Russian Life is a 50-year-old bimonthly magazine covering Russian culture, history, business, society and travel.
• Washington Gardener magazine is a gardening publication published specifically for Washington DC and its suburbs.
• Yes! Magazine highlights positive stories of a transformation toward a more just, sustainable, and compassionate world.

What we mean by "better paper"

Better Paper refers to paper with a cleaner, greener, more efficient paper production process at every stage - including pulping, paper-making, printing, distribution and recycling.  Green America's Better Paper Project has helped hundreds of publishers choose better paper by developing smart purchasing policies to ensure the use of recycled and FSC certified papers. Consumers have made it clear: they want sustainable products from companies that reflect their values. Your company must consider environmental and social impacts to remain relevant in today's market (we also think it's just the right thing to do).

Far too many magazines in the US contain most of the “brand-risk” ingredients instead of the better paper ingredients. The good news is that doesn’t have to be the case. There are many different environmentally-responsible paper options on the market from a variety of different paper mills, merchants and printers.  Publishers have an opportunity to create the market for ever-increasing rates of recycled paper.

Click here to receive free copies of our publisher resource kit and our Green In All Grades Report.
 

Nearly 50% of all trees harvested in North America are turned into some type of paper product. Using post-consumer recycled paper reduces the need to log forests. Additionally, the paper industry consumes much more than just our forests. Producing paper from virgin fiber is both energy and water intensive, and releases significant amounts of greenhouse gases into our atmosphere. Using recycled paper measurably reduces these impacts.

Every ton of recycled fiber displacing a ton of virgin fiber saves:

Using recycled paper is the most important step in reducing a publication’s ecological footprint. Paper accounts for approximately over one quarter of the solid waste clogging up U.S. landfills, and while recycling has increased in years past, recovery of printing and writing grades of paper remain extremely low. 

We lend our expertise to create an environmental stewardship policy that illustrates a long-term vision for sustainable publishing, articulating key principles and demonstrating a commitment to environmental stewardship. Publishers that factor sustainability into their core business strategies are well positioned to take advantage of emerging opportunities in the radically changing market environment. Developing a sustainable, strategic paper policy set you up to grow profitably, and the Better Paper Project can assist you every step of the way!

Publisher Responses

The Green America Better Paper Project helps publishers cut through the clutter in order to understand the environmentally beneficial paper options available.

  - Bryan Welch, CEO, Ogden Publications

The Better Paper Project helped us attain our wish to publish a greener magazine by providing the information needed to fit our magazine and budget… As a magazine publisher, we consider them a valuable resource in helping to protect our forests and planet.

 - Sita Stuhlmiller, Editor, Light of Consciousness: Journal of Spiritual Awakening
 

Green America’s Better Paper Project director… agreed to guide us through the thicket of rules, paper suppliers, and acronyms we’d need to learn about to go green.

    - James Shaheen, Editor & Publisher, Tricycle

Carbon capture and storage uses existing technology on new power plants or retrofits old power plants in order to capture up to 90% of carbon dioxide produced in the combustion of fossil fuels. The CO2 is then transported by pipeline or ship where it can be injected into underground geological formations for long term storage (1).

Carbon capture and storage is not a viable option for both environmental and economic reasons.

• Building and retrofitting plants with carbon capture technology, and constructing the transport infrastructure, like ships and pipelines, represents a huge cost investment that could be better spent on clean energy.

• Carbon capture technology exacts an “energy penalty” of 25-40% on power plants, meaning that more coal must be burned to keep up the same rate of energy production (2).

• Since the demand for coal from each plant will be higher, more coal will have to be mined and shipped, increasing the public health and environmental costs associated with coal mining.

• Storing CO2 underground can acidify aquifers, which can cause leaching of heavy metals into groundwater (3).

• Injection of CO2 into geologic formations can cause fracturing, which could cause earthquakes or release large quantities of stored CO2 into the atmosphere (4).

(1) "What Is CCS?" – The Carbon Capture & Storage Association (CCSA). Web. 20 Sept. 2016.

(2) Supekar, Sarang D., and Steven J. Skerlos. "Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants." Environmental Science & Technology Environ. Sci. Technol. 49.20 (2015): 12576-2584. Web.

(3) "IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage." Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2005. Web. 20 Sept. 2016.

(4) Renard, F., E. Gundersen, R. Hellmann, M. Collombet, and Y. Le Guen. "Numerical Modeling of the Effect of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration on the Rate of Pressure Solution Creep in Limestone: Preliminary Results." Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Oil & Gas Science and Technology 60.2 (2005): 381-99. Web.

While some policymakers support "clean coal," coal can never be clean. It is harmful to both people and the planet. Here are a dozen reasons why.

Coal Contributes to Climate Change

The burning of fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, increasing levels of CO2 and other gasses, trapping heat, and contributing to global climate change.

• Coal combustion releases the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) during combustion. Coal power plants release more greenhouse gases per unit of energy produced than any other electricity source (1).

• Coal supplies around 33% of the energy used for electricity in the United States, which makes coal-fired power plants a prime target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (2). (Coal use for electricity is declining, by 2018 the electricity energy share for coal has fallen to 27%).

• Luckily, coal power plants are closing down throughout the U.S. as the fuel becomes less profitable due to state and federal regulations, an aging fleet, and competition from other sectors such as natural gas, wind, and solar (3).

• The coal mining process releases methane, which is 87 more potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2 over a 20 year period (4).

• Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies have been marketed as a way to address climate emissions from burning coal, by pumping CO2 produced through burning coal underground instead of into the air. However, the technology is extremely expensive, and even if the carbon can be sequestered, the coal-fired plant will still result in destructive coal mining as well as toxic coal ash as a byproduct.

Coal Creates Local Air Pollution

Air pollution is another side-effect of fossil fuel use. Air pollution is generally more regional than the effects of carbon dioxide, and can have devastating impacts on local populations and ecosystems.

• Coal combustion releases sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which react with water and oxygen to form acid rain. Acid rain corrodes buildings and structures and acidifies freshwater environments, damaging aquatic ecosystems (5).

• Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) react to form ground-level ozone, or smog. Smog can cause a variety of respiratory and cardiovascular effects and is especially dangerous to the elderly, young children, and people with asthma (6).

• Fine particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) is released into the air in the form of fly ash. This particulate matter gets lodged in the lungs when inhaled and increases the risk for pulmonary diseases, including lung cancer (7).

Coal is Devastating for Water Pollution

Like air pollution, water pollution is another more localized effect of fossil fuel use. Water is usually polluted during the process of extraction or in the handling of waste products. Water pollution can also have devastating impacts on human health and the environment.

• Coal-fired power plants account for 41% of anthropogenic (human-caused) mercury emissions, which can travel long distances before being deposited in soil or water. Mercury accumulates in food-chains and can reach very high levels in many types of fish that are consumed by humans. Mercury is highly toxic and is especially dangerous to children (8).

• Coal combustion waste contains many toxic chemicals and heavy metals, which are known to cause birth defects, reproductive disorders, neurological damage, learning disabilities, kidney disease, and diabetes (9).

• This waste is often stored in large impoundment ponds. Massive spills from breaches in these ponds are documented, and many ponds are currently classified as “high hazard” by the EPA. This means they are at risk to spill and cause significant property damage, environmental damage, injuries, and deaths (9).

• Under certain conditions, impoundment ponds are also known to leach contaminants like arsenic into the soil and groundwater, potentially poisoning freshwater sources (10).

(1) “Carbon Dioxide Emissions Coeffecients.” EIA.gov U.S. Energy Information Administration. Feb. 2016. Web. 23 Aug. 2016.

(2) “Frequently Asked Questions.” EIA.gov. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Apr. 2016. Web. 23 Aug. 2016.

(3) "Impact of EPA’s Regulatory Assault on Power Plants." IER.org Institute for Energy Research, June 2012. Web. 23 Aug. 2016

(4) "Overview of Greenhouse Gases." EPA.gov. Environmental Protection Agency. Web. 23 Aug. 2016.

(5) “What is Acid Rain?” EPA.gov. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. March 2016. Web. 23 Aug. 2016

(6) “Health Effects of Ozone Pollution.” EPA.gov. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Web. 23 Aug. 2016

(7) “Coal Ash Basics." EPA.gov. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. June 2016. Web. 23 Aug. 2016

(8) Trasande, Leonardo, Philip J. Landrigan, and Clyde Schechter. "Public Health and Economic Consequences of Methyl Mercury Toxicity to the Developing Brain." Environmental Health Perspectives 113.5 (2005): 590-96.

(9) "Coming Clean: What the EPA Knows About the Dangers of Coal Ash." The Environmental Integrity Project and Earthjustice. May 2009. Web. 24 Aug. 2016.

(10) Clean Air Task Force. Dirty Air, Dirty Power: Mortality and Health Damage Due to Air Pollution from Power Plants. June 2004. Web. 24 Aug. 2016.

Natural gas has been promoted as a so-called “transition fuel,” the bridge to renewable energy. Combustion of natural gas emits about half as much carbon as coal, so it has been touted as a potential bridge between an economy that runs mostly on coal and one that runs entirely on renewables.

Despite the fact that natural gas burns cleaner than coal, there are several good reasons why we should focus on renewables and why investment in transition fuels impedes progress:

1. Economic resources are better spent on efficiency and renewable energy. The resources and technology exist to move towards 100% renewable energy. Extra investment in this technology only makes it better and cheaper.
2. Investing in a transition fuel is a dead end. The money spent on natural gas power facilities and infrastructure takes decades to recuperate. Companies would need to use these facilities for their full lifetimes, delaying the switch to renewables for far too long.
3. Investment in natural gas does not incentivize a move to renewable energy. Stakeholders will be actively opposed to laws and regulations that promote clean power at the expense of natural gas companies.
4. Energy companies want to export natural gas from the U.S. overseas and are currently building export facilities on the U.S. coasts. The exporting of natural gas will cause increased investment in pipeline infrastructure, increase natural gas fracking in the U.S., expose communities to the potential for catastrophic leaks or explosions, and slow the transition to renewable energy worldwide.

Green America’s role:

Green America is opposed to natural gas fracking, the building of new natural gas infrastructure, and natural gas exports. Working with our allies, we have mobilized our business and individual members to oppose natural gas fracking at the state level, supported increased federal regulation of natural gas wells to reduce leaks, and opposed export facilities on both coasts. (link to blog posts)

What you can do:

Take action with Green America to oppose natural gas and dirty energy.

Adopt clean energy sources for your electricity, install solar power at home, and increase your energy efficiency at home.

Contact Earthshade Natural Window Fashions: Website | YouTube

If you have conventional window shades, they could be making you sick. C.W. Swanson originally worked for a major window fashions dealer. While on a service call, he realized that the older vinyl shades he was working on still gave off the same strong chemical odors years after installation that the new shades he installed day after day emitted. The persistent smell made him curious, so he started researching. He discovered that vinyl, also known as polyvinyl chloride or PVC, is highly toxic throughout its lifecycle. Making and incinerating vinyl at disposal generates carcinogenic dioxin, and vinyl often releases hormone-disrupting phthalates during use.

Even fabric shades could have toxicity issues, he found, since companies may treat both fabric and vinyl shades with chemicals to repel water, mold, sun-bleaching, and stains. Manufacturers may add toxic heavy metals, untested nano-finishes, and carcinogenic formaldehyde to their products, along with chemical fungicides and UV protectants.

“[I discovered the] emerging ties between basic household items, indoor air quality, and quality of health or life,” says Swanson, who was very surprised to discover that such commonplace items could cause severe health problems.

Swanson says that in his experience, many retailers do not know the origins of or ingredients in the treatments used on the materials they receive from manufacturers. Plus, he says, “Import and trade laws often add another level of potential exposure [to chemicals] through often-required fumigation of certain raw materials.” Raw materials such as woods, bamboo, reeds, grasses, etc. are often fumigated for insects, molds, and mildews when they are imported to the US.

In addition, he says, “most of the third-party rating systems [for window coverings] fail to test products under the true operating circumstances such as sunlight,” he says, noting that heat and light can cause certain chemicals to offgas from some window-covering materials.

So in 1999, Swanson decided to put his research skills toward finding nontoxic window covering alternatives, and he founded Earthshade Natural Window Fashions.

While at a trade show, he met with a man representing a family with three generations of experience in fabric weaving and creating textile products by hand. The two joined together to make Earthshade the natural and chemically sensitive company it is today.

Earthshade Natural Window Fashions has three lines of shades: HappyShades Roman shades, SafeShades roller shades, and Better-Blinds mini- and Venetian blinds. All are low-emission or synthetic-chemical-free.

The company creates HappyShades Roman shades from natural materials, including untreated grasses, reeds, bamboo, and other fibers. It sources these materials from as close to where they will be woven together as possible, directly from farms or small villages in places like Central and South America and Vietnam. Earthshade often works with the indigenous populations of these areas, sometimes creating new sources of income by buying strong, untreated grasses whose only purpose previously was to control erosion.

As a testament to their all-natural make-up, all HappyShades products are compostable when they reach they end of their service life.

“The compostability at the end of the service life is truly a remarkable achievement, as there is no other shading product in the world (We look for others on a regular basis!) that has been tested for compostability,” claims Swanson.

The SafeShades line came into existence after years of the company being asked by green-minded architects to create less-toxic roller shades for schools, hospitals, airports, and other places. SafeShades roller shades come in varieties for light blocking, heat reduction, privacy, insulation, noise reduction, and more. SafeShades are made from polyester, recycled polyester, or a mixture of polyester and cotton. Polyester is an easy-to-clean fabric and lasts for many years, making it practical for schools and hospitals.

The reason Earthshade held out against roller shades for so long was due to the high emissions from conventional roller-shade polyesters.

“Today, all the fabrics we use average many hundreds of parts per million lower in emissions than anything else that’s out there,” says Swanson.

Earthshade also makes mini and Venetian Better-Blinds using recycled aluminum and “minimal plastic”. The slats for Better-Blinds are uncoated.

95 percent of the HappyShades and 50 percent of the Safe-Shades line is suitable for people with chemical sensitives.

Since Earthshade is committed to making its products last a long time, it will send customers replacement parts or walk them through do-it-yourself repair procedures to keep its window coverings in working order. But Swanson is quick to promise that Earthshade products don’t often need repairs.

Selling products through select retailers in seven states or via online mail-order, in a “highly personable and detailed manner,” Earthshade Natural Window Fashions has stayed true to its mission of providing window treatments that are as unique and safe as possible. And that comes from being authentic, which Swanson highly values.

“We want to be transparent,” he says. “We want to tell people what something is rather than what it’s not because we feel people deserve at least a basic level of respect. So authenticity, absolutely.

Contact Calvert Foundation

Many people view investing solely as the hustle and bustle of Wall Street at peak frenzy. Or, perhaps as the result of a ribbon-cutting ceremony in which someone who donated an unfathomable amount of money gleefully smiles in front of a building bearing his or her name. Investing, at its extremes, is those things—but Calvert Foundation m operates on a different model. It aims to channel investment dollars to organizations addressing real needs in low- and middle-income areas.

Calvert Foundation began when the founders of Calvert Investments, a pioneering socially responsible mutual fund company, decided to see if they could find a way to funnel more capital into low-income areas across the US and around the world, and joined with the Ford, MacArthur, and Mott Foundations to make it happen, says Calvert Foundation vice president of investment partnerships, Justin Conway.

As Conway recalls, “From day one, it was, ‘How can we create a financial institution that has a real social justice mission and is able to get this capital to work in communities?’”

So in 1995, they set up Calvert Foundation as a nonprofit investment firm to help bridge the gap between those who want their money to be a part of something good and the organizations doing the good.

Calvert Foundation is a certified community development financial institution (CDFI), which aims to use its investments to economically lift up low- and middle-income areas through community investing.

Community investing is a socially responsible investing strategy that puts investor dollars into building up areas that are often underserved by traditional banks. Community investing dollars may provide fair loans for low-income people to buy a home, start a business, or obtain a college education, enabling them to lift themselves up economically.

Since 1995, over 15,000 investors have invested over $1 billion into Calvert Foundation to support hundreds of sustainable-development nonprofits and social enterprises on the ground in 60 countries and throughout the US. Calvert Foundation disperses the money as loans to advance local solutions to critical challenges in their communities.

The Foundation’s flagship investment vehicle is the Community Investment Note, and its key benefit is that it makes community investing easy: People may invest in the Note for as little as $20 online and through their brokerage accounts.

Investors may choose the cause they want to support— from women’s empowerment to affordable housing—as well as a number of domestic and international places. They can choose their investment term (from 1-10 years) and how much interest their Note will earn (from 0-3 percent). Since the foundation’s inception, over 13,000 people have invested in the Notes.

“It’s one of the ways where individuals with as little as 20 dollars and institutions that are investing tens of millions of dollars can, through our risk-mitigated structure, have a high impact in low-income communities,” says Conway.

For example, investments in the Note supported a loan to IFF, a Midwestern CDFI, which then assisted Beyond Housing, a nonprofit working to build affordable housing, strengthen health and human services, and build community engagement in Pagedale, MO, a low-wealth community of color near St. Louis. Overseas, Note investors helped Healthpoint Services, a sustainable social business enterprise in India’s Punjab region, provide low-cost clean water, wireless Internet access, and health care to those in poverty.

Conway says that the Foundation lowers investor risk by investing in a diverse pool of carefully vetted community development institutions and having layers of reserves to protect against losses. To date, Calvert Foundation boasts a 100 percent repayment rate to Note investors.

The Foundation has created a number of investing opportunities, including its Ours to Own program and its Women Investing in Women Initiative (WIN-WIN).

Launched in 2014, Ours to Own allows investors to support unmet needs in cities they care about, including Denver and Minneapolis, with more cities to be added in the future.

Says Conway, “We wanted to provide a vehicle for people in larger cities in the US to support local organizations and projects there … and that’s been a real success.”

In 2012, Calvert Foundation started the WIN-WIN program to help people invest in and support organizations and projects in the US and internationally that empower women and girls, says Conway. Investments into WIN-WIN have already been instrumental in building a new center for Girls Inc. in downtown Oakland, for example.

Conway, whose first job out of college was with Green America’s Community Investing program, says that investors can rest assured that their money has a positive impact when invested through Calvert Foundation: “I get to work directly with investors and financial advisors, and I get to see the money move.”

And, he says, it moves from vastly different sources, because the Notes’ low minimum investment means that people from a variety of financial backgrounds, as well as organizations and nonprofits that want to support great causes, can get involved.

“Whether it’s a foundation trying to figure out how to do its first program-related investments, or an individual who says, ‘Hey, I’m thinking about how my dollars can have more purpose,’ Calvert Foundation is [a powerful] way to do it,” he says.

Shireen has served as Director of Digital Communications, Online Communications Manager, Food Campaigns Coordinator, Senior Web Developer, and Sustainable Business Standards Committee Member for Green America.

Take action with Green America's campaigns:

Darden—the parent company of Olive Garden, Yard House, LongHorn Steakhouse, and other franchises—has over 1,500 franchise locations, employs 150,000 people, and serves more than 320 million meals per year. It’s the largest sit-down restaurant company in the world. With incredible brand recognition comes incredible power: The company can move the restaurant industry in a more sustainable direction by improving the way it treats workers and procures food.

That’s why Green America, in coalition with 15 allied organizations, has launched the Good Food Now campaign, to demand that Darden adopt better practices. The Good Food Now campaign calls for Darden to improve its labor practices and source 20 percent of its purchases under environmental, health, labor, and animal-welfare criteria aligned with the Good Food Purchasing Policy created by the Los Angeles Food Policy Council. For example, the campaign asks Darden to build its menus around local and regional food. At present, the chain does not have a local food policy. Consequently, since 70 percent of America’s fruit and nuts and 55 percent of its vegetables come from California, the almonds that top a salad at an Olive Garden in New York may have traveled 3,000 miles to end up on that plate.

“By purchasing food that’s traveled across the continent, restaurants are increasing the food’s environmental and climate impact,” says Anna Meyer, food campaigns manager at Green America. “If Darden committed to local and organic purchasing, it could decrease its carbon footprint and boost local economies.”

Darden also needs to improve its treatment of workers. The federal minimum wage for tipped employees is $2.13 an hour. Though Darden restaurants meet the federal minimum, that doesn’t mean its workers earn enough to make ends meet. Nationally, the median annual income for tipped workers is under $15,000, which puts them just above the federal poverty line and below what a person making the $7.25 federal minimum wage for hourly work would earn.

Plus, some 60 percent of Darden’s employees are part-time. Chain restaurants often aim to keep their staff at part-time to avoid a legal obligation to provide health insurance, sick leave, and other essential benefits.

“It’s time for Darden restaurants and other big chains to step it up,” says Meyer. “They have the power to effect change through buying local and organic food and ending worker exploitation.”

Tell Darden to be more accountable to workers and the planet: Take action at Good-food-now.com.

Terms and Conditions

Please read this Terms and Conditions of Use Agreement before accessing the Website.

This Terms and Conditions of Use Agreement (this "Agreement") sets the standards of use of Green America's website, and access to the www.greenamerica.org website (the "Web site") for general users, Members of Green America, Members of the Green Business Network at Green America ("GBN", "we", "us", or "our") and other audiences of Green America. By using the Website, you agree to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If you do not agree to the terms and conditions of this Agreement you should immediately cease all usage of the Web site. We reserve the right, at any time, to modify, alter, amend, or update this Agreement without prior notice. Modifications will become effective immediately upon being posted on the Web site. Your continued use of the Web site and the services offered on the Web site after modifications or updates are posted constitutes an acknowledgement and acceptance by you of this Agreement and its amendments, modifications, or updates.

Application of Website

This Agreement shall apply to all users or subscribers of and visitors to the Web site, including users who contribute content, information, or other materials or services on the Web site as well as Members.

Subscription/GBN Members

In order to access certain parts of the Web site, you will be required to subscribe for our services and create a GBN account, thereby becoming a GBN Member (a "Member"). As a Member, you acknowledge and agree that:

(a) you will provide accurate and complete information when creating and/or updating your account;

(b) you are solely responsible for any activity that occurs on your account and you must keep your login information secure;

(c) when completing your assessment and making any updates to your account (including updating the initiatives you have completed) you will provide accurate and factually correct information;

(g) as part of our efforts to ensure compliance with our services and the accuracy of information provided to us, we reserve the right to review the overall progression of a company's performance in social and environmental responsibility based on Green America's strict standards. Upon meeting requirements, a business must undergo a review by Green America's Standards Committee in order to attain the appropriate Seal;

(h) you are subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and

(i) we reserve the right to discontinue and/or revoke your GBN membership as a result of (1) your breach of any of the foregoing, (2) your insolvency, bankruptcy, or assignment for the benefit of creditors, and (3) a review that demonstrates you have provided inaccurate or incorrect information regarding the initiatives that have been completed and complied with.

(j) we reserve the right to revoke your use of the Green America Green Business Seal of Approval at our sole discretion, at any time, for any reason including but not limited to (1) a failure on your part to pay membership dues in a timely manner; (2) complaints about your business practices (including but not limited to customer fraud or performance misrepresentations) or violation of social and environmental principles of membership (including but not limited to such actions as sourcing products made with forced child labor or engaging in discriminatory hiring practices); (3) failure to achieve minimum standards of social and/or environmental performance in GreenGain to qualify for continued participation a special Green America program, such as Green Festivals.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, please notify us immediately of unauthorized use of your GBN account by emailing us at info@greenamerica.org.

Privacy Policy

We respect the privacy of the users, subscribers, Members, and visitors to the Web site. 

Copyright and Trademark Information

All content included or available to end users on the Web site, including text, graphics, images and illustrations is © Green America, with all rights reserved, or is the property of Green America and/or third parties protected by intellectual property rights. All source code related to operation and production of the Web site is © Green America, with all rights reserved, or is the property of Green America and/or third parties protected by intellectual property rights. Any use of materials on the Web site, including reproduction for purposes other than those noted herein, modification, distribution, or replication, any form of data extraction or data mining, or other commercial exploitation of any kind without our prior written permission is strictly prohibited. You agree that you will not use any robot, spider, or other automatic device, or manual process to monitor or copy our web pages or the information contained therein without our prior written permission.

Green Business Network is a proprietary mark of Green America registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Our trademarks, including the aforementioned, may not be used in connection with any product or service that is not provided by us, in any manner that is likely to cause confusion among customers, or in any manner that disparages or discredits us.

All trademarks not owned by us and displayed on the Web site are trademarks of their respective owners, and constitute neither an endorsement nor a recommendation of such owner. In addition, such use of trademarks or links to the Web sites of third parties is not intended to imply, directly or indirectly, that those third parties endorse or have any affiliation with us.

Modifications and Interruption of Service

We reserve the right to modify or discontinue our services with or without notice to you. We shall not be liable to you or any third party should we exercise our right to modify or discontinue our services and/or the Web site. You acknowledge and accept that we do not guarantee continuous, uninterrupted or secure access to the Web site and operation of the Web site may be interfered with or adversely affected by numerous factors or circumstances outside of our control.

Third-Party Sites

The Web site may include links to other sites on the Internet that are owned and operated by online merchants and other third parties. You acknowledge that we are not responsible for the availability of, or the content located on or through, any third-party site. You should contact the site administrator or webmaster for those third-party sites if you have any concerns regarding such links or the content located on such sites. Your use of those third-party sites is subject to the terms of use and privacy policies of each site and we are not responsible therein. We encourage you to review the privacy policies of such third-party sites.

Disclaimer of Warranties

The website and the information and content provided through it are provided by us on an "as is" and on an "as available" basis. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the use or the results of the website in terms of its correctness, accuracy, reliability, or otherwise. We shall have no liability for any interruptions in the use of the website. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, we disclaim all warranties of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to any warranties of title, implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and warranties of non-infringement. You expressly agree that use of the website, including all content, data, or information distributed by, downloaded or accessed from or through the website, is at your sole risk. We assume no responsibility for and make no warranty or representation as to the accuracy, currency, completeness, reliability, or usefulness of the information or content of the website, including without limitation, the estimated environmental and social impact, the cost savings, the ease of implementation, and the overall rating system of initiatives. Some jurisdictions do not allow the exclusion of certain warranties, therefore some of the above warranties may not be applicable.

Limitation of Liability

We shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever, and in particular we shall not be liable for any compensatory, special, direct, indirect, consequential, punitive, or incidental damages, or damages for lost profits, loss of revenue, loss of data, loss of or damage to property, or loss of use, arising out of or related to the website or the information contained in it, whether such damages arise in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, in equity, at law, or otherwise, even if we have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some jurisdictions do not allow for the limitation or exclusion of liability for incidental or consequential damages, therefore some of the above limitations are inapplicable.

Indemnification

You agree to indemnify and hold us, our parent company, any subsidiaries, affiliates, managers, members, officers and/or employees, harmless from any claim or demand, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, made by any third party due to or arising out of your use of the Website and our services, the violation of this Agreement, or infringement by you, or other use of our services using your computer, of any intellectual property or any other right of any person or entity.

Disclaimer Regarding Accuracy of Vendor Information

Green America contains links to other websites, including websites that sell products and services. Green America does not warrant or guarantee in any way that prices, shipping costs, taxes, products or descriptions, or any other content on the Websites is accurate, complete, reliable, current or error-free. Site content is provided for informational purposes only and Green America shall have no liability for inaccuracy or incompleteness in product or service content, user ratings or commentary, or other content on the Website. If there is any discrepancy between information on the Websites and information on a merchant's or service provider's site, the information on the merchant's or service provider's site shall govern.

Governing Jurisdiction/Trial by Jury

This agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the District of Columbia as they apply to agreements made and solely performed therein. You irrevocably consent and waive all objection to personal jurisdiction and venue in the state and federal courts located in the District of Columbia, USA, and you shall not commence or prosecute any suit or action except in the foregoing courts. Each of the parties hereto knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally waives any rights it may have to a trial by jury in respect of any litigation based hereon, or arising out of, under, or in connection with, this agreement, or any course of conduct, course of dealing or statements (whether verbal or written) relating to the foregoing. This provision is a material inducement for the parties hereto to enter into this agreement.

Compliance with Laws

You assume all knowledge of applicable law and are responsible for compliance with any such laws. You may not use the Website or our services in any way that violates applicable local, state, federal, or international laws, regulations, statutes, or other government requirements. You further agree not to transmit any material that encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal, or national law or regulation.

Notification of Claimed Copyright Infringement

Pursuant to Section 5.12(c) of the Copyright Revision Act, as enacted through the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we designate the following as our agent for receipt of notifications of claimed copyright infringement:

Green America 
1612 K Street, Suite 600 
Washington, D.C. 20006 
contact@greenamerica.org

Other Terms

If any provision of this Agreement shall be unlawful, void, or unenforceable for any reason, the other provisions (and any partially-enforceable provision) shall not be affected thereby and shall remain valid and enforceable to the maximum possible extent. You agree that this Agreement and any other agreements referenced herein may be assigned by us, in our sole discretion, to a third party in the event of a sale, merger, or acquisition. This Agreement shall apply in addition to, and shall not be superseded by, any other written agreement between us in relation to your participation as a subscriber to our services. You agree that by accepting this Agreement, you are consenting to the use and disclosure of your personally identifiable information and other practices.

The following Web sites are operated by Green America, located at 1612 K Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006. Our telephone number is (202)872-5307.

For many eco-warriors, it's important to live the lifestyle of eco eating. Whether that's committing to Meatless Mondays or dabbling with pescatarianism, the importance of buying organic always rings through.

The organic label is a great way to ensure your food is coming from farms that do not use GMOs (genetically modified organisms) and harsh chemical pesticides and fertilizers. It is becoming increasingly common to see foods with this label not just at Whole Foods and natural food stores but at any grocery store in your area. You may already be buying organic food whenever possible, but is there an even better option?

The answer is a resounding yes.

While buying organic is important (and the best choice by far at the supermarket), buying locally grown food from farmer’s markets in your community can be a superior choice for a number of reasons. Here are our top 9! Provided that the farms you buy from locally minimize the use of harsh chemicals like pesticides and fertilizers and use sustainable practices, they will beat out grocery store organic every time. These farms may or may not be certified organic but by asking a few simple questions you can learn a lot about their commitment to sustainability. Read on and find out how frequenting your local farmer’s market can benefit the environment, the community, and your health.

1. Flavor

Ethically speaking, we want a lot from our food but at the end of the day food needs to actually taste good. Once you do a side-by-side flavor comparison of a store-bought organic tomato and a juicy heirloom tomato from your local farmers’ market you may never step foot into a grocery store again. Shipping food across the country which often arrives in your kitchen four to seven days after it was picked can really affect flavor and freshness negatively. The produce at farmer’s markets is typically harvested the day before the market, giving you the freshest and tastiest fruits and vegetables possible. An added bonus, you’re more likely to get your picky kids to eat their vegetables when they are filled with flavor.

2. Nutrition

Along the same lines, as flavor is lost throughout the shipping journey, nutrition can be lost too. Additionally, foods that are often shipped before they are ripe (like tomatoes) never develop their full nutrient content. The bright alluring colors you see of the vegetables arranged on farmer’s market stands are a great indicator of their high nutrient densities. Bolster your health and immunity as winter cold season wraps up with a rainbow of produce from your local farmer’s market!

3. Supporting Local Farmers

Buying local supports the people who work hard in your community and are committed to sustainable agriculture. Organic food is undoubtedly grown with better practices than conventional agriculture, but the label does allow for farming on a more industrial scale which can include mono-cropping.

You can use your money to support smaller, diversified vegetable operations that foster soil health and encourage biodiversity on their land. The farmer’s market is a great opportunity to have a face-to-face conversation with your farmer and see what their practices are like, what inputs they use, and how they strategize with sustainability in mind. You may find that there are farmers in your area who are not certified organic but whose practices exceed the ecological requirements for the certification.

4. Environmental Benefits

In addition to supporting your wonderful local farmers’ sustainable practices, cutting out shipping emissions is sure to help lower your carbon footprint. Produce in grocery stores is shipped an average of 1,500 miles to get to consumers whereas farmer’s market produce arrives from farms which are unlikely to be over 100 miles away. Furthermore, the packaging waste in grocery stores can be avoided at farmer’s markets, especially if you come prepared with reusable bags.

5. Ethical eating

While organic certified brands have better animal welfare standards than their conventional counterparts, they are not perfect. The organic certification requires that animals have access to outdoor pasture but does not specify requirements for size or duration of that access.  The Farmer’s market is a great place to find farmers raising animals for meat and eggs in ways that are both environmentally sustainable and ethically responsible. Ask farmers about the size of the pasture animals are contained in and how long they are given access to pasture. Questions about the animals’ diet and use of antibiotics will also give you an idea of their standard of care. If you truly want to see where animals are being raised, many farms participating in markets will be happy to have you drop by for a farm visit!

6. Educational opportunities

It’s important to know where your food comes from, and the best source to learn from is the people who grow it! Don’t be afraid to ask questions about vegetable varieties you may not have seen before, growing methods, and how to use different vegetables. Farmers have pride in and are usually happy to talk about their work. Many farmer’s market stands also have literature and signage about topics ranging from seasonality to cooking and recipes. Use the farmer’s market as a classroom in your sustainable food education.

7. Eating seasonally

Your local grocery stores purchase food from across the country so that people can eat tomatoes, zucchini, and peppers in the middle of winter when these foods are unable to be grown locally. While having access to these delicious foods year round seems great, there is a lot to be said for eating locally and seasonally. After being shipped long distances, these foods are never as flavorful or nutritious as they were when first picked. Eating seasonally gives you a chance to take a break from foods when they are out of season and then become excited when they are available in their best form. A seasonal diet also helps you branch out and try foods that are in season which you may not have previously considered.

8. Diversify your diet

Farmer's markets offer a wealth of produce that you usually won’t find at grocery stores. From heirloom varieties to produce that doesn’t ship well or is regionally specific to your area, you will find new and interesting fruits and vegetables to try each week. Farmers often have suggestions for how to best use these foods that they will share with you. The internet is also a great resource to find recipes and nutritional information for these unique and exciting varieties.

9. Have fun!

Aside from all its numerous benefits, the farmer’s market is simply a fun weekend activity! Especially with spring approaching, spending the day outdoors taking in the inviting sights and smells of the farmer’s market is an amazing way to spend time with friends and family. Find a farmer’s market in your area today and go above and beyond organic, you won’t want to go back!

Read about more eco eating tips, challenges, and fun facts at GreenAmerica.org/good-food.